Quantcast
Channel: The Great God Pan Is Dead
Viewing all 665 articles
Browse latest View live

Endings and Beginnings

$
0
0
Robert Boyd


This has nothing to do with beginnings and endings--I just liked it (hat tip to Scott Gilbert)

Goodbye Joanna. Hello Brandon. There was a slightly confusing news bit in the Houston Press recently about the Joanna closing up. I asked Cody Ledvina about it, and here's what he told me.
The Joanna's last show is May 31st (Bill Willis). I'm doing all the press on Monday. Brian [Rod, Joanna's co-director] and I decided it was time to wrap it up. While I'm moving on to The Brandon, Brian will be working on projects in Houston and Austin.
"Brandon"? Was "Chad" taken?
Brandon is my puppet who happens to also be the director of the space. Although Chad is equally as funny a name for a space.
Is Domy closing?
I don't know. That's up to Dan [Fergus, owner of Domy]. There is the possibility of it moving next to Brasil in what is currently "Space". I know a lot of people will be upset.
Are you just taking the whole Domy space?
It'll be all gallery space. We have our fall programming already in line to start with a large group show in September.
Why are you guys closing tha Joanna?
I think it was just time. Brian wants to focus on other projects and because he was the lease holder of the space I totally respect his decision. It was totally amicable.
Domy closed down in Austin, and I guess it could happen in Houston. Let me say, as someone who has spent hundreds of dollars over the years on books at Domy, that its closing would be tragic. But given the tough market for "brick and morter" bookstores, I would understand. Nonetheless, while I have nothing against Space, the world is full of stores that sell tchotchkes but still needs eccentric art bookstores like Domy.

All that said, welcome Brandon!


Future site of Brandon. (Via indiehouston.org)

 
Charles Burns at the 2010 BCGF

Goodbye Brooklyn Comics and Graphics Festival. In the world of art comics, there are a bunch of small festivals around the country and in Canada. At any given time, one of them is considered the standard bearer--first APE, then SPX, then MoCCA and most recently the Brooklyn Comics and Graphics Festival. (Now the champion is TCAF in Toronto based on what I've heard).  The BCGF has run since 2009. I attended two of them--2010 and 2012. I loved the 2010 festival but was pretty miserable at the 2012 festival. My misery was mostly my own fault, but part of the problem in 2012 was that the festival had gotten too big and too crowded for its physical venues.

The festival was owned by three people: Dan Nadel, who is also the owner of the comics and art book publisher PictureBox and co-edits the Comics Journal website; Gabriel Fowler, owner of Desert Island, which is my favorite comic store in the world (visit it if you're ever in the Williamsburg neighborhood of Brooklyn); and Bill Kartalopoulos, an independent scholar of comics who has recently started a publishing company, Rebus. Apparently tensions between the three owners had increased over the past few months, and on May 16, Kartalopoulos and Nadel announced the end.

Nadel, Kartalopoulos and Fowler each have a different take events, but I think in part the end of the BCGF can be attributed to its success. After the 2012 show, they must have realized that they needed to grow or die. But growth is a big commitment. Each of these guys is quite busy with other stuff, and growing would have probably required serious sacrifices in time from all of them. Would Nadel be willing to give up working of the Comics Journal, or would Kartalopoulos be willing to drop Rebus in order to expand the BCGF? Apparently not, and I don't blame them.

According to the article in the Comics Journal, Fowler still seems pretty keen on a show of some sort. I wouldn't be entirely surprised if he got together some new partners and put on a similar show with a different name.


Michael Heizer, 45°, 90°, 180°, 1983, Color lithograph, screenprint, etching with stamps on paper. 

Not really relevant to the topic at hand, but I don't know where else to put it. This lithograph by Michael Heizer is being auctioned right now--the perfect gift for an art-loving Rice University engineer. The lithograph is a spin-off from the large piece in the engineering quad at Rice, 45°, 90°, 180°. Since it was installed in 1984 (I was an undergraduate at the time), it has been a popular site for climbing expeditions, sunbathing and other activities.

 
Photo by David Rod from Rice News, 2007



Share


Continuum's Live Art Series - Night 4 (NSFW)

$
0
0
Dean Liscum

By the Fourth night of Continuum's Live Art Series, it was very clear to me that these shows don't have a theme. There is a show. There are artists. Performances happen. Nonetheless, themes emerge if for no other reason than we are pattern recognition machines eager to find rhythm and commonality in even the most random phenomena. In CLAS 4, I found the theme to be physical minimalism, a "muscle dance" if you will, a term which I gleefully and un-apologetically stole from Ms. Y.E. Torres. A majority of the performances seemed to be devoid of narrative drama, but replete with physical tension.

As is my habit, I was running a little late and I literally stepped into the evening's opening performance, In Remembrance of Me by Joshua Yates. He was quietly kneeling in the center of six concentric circles of broken (one could say disassembled) cinder blocks. He continued to meditate\pray while I jockeyed for a position upstairs at Avant Garden.

Without saying a word, Yates picked up a cinder block. He held it close to his face, close enough to smell, close enough to kiss and mouth words to it. Perhaps blessing. Perhaps cursing. Perhaps comforting. Perhaps scolding. Then he placed the fragment in a white nylon bag, re-positioned his body every so slightly in a counter-clockwise direction to toward the next fragment. Repeated the ritual. He performed the same process for each rock in the circle.

 
Joshua Yates amid the 6 rings of disassembled cinder blocks


Sniff? Lick? Kiss? Bless?
 
Once he'd gathered all the rocks in the circle into the bag, he stood up, twisted the top of the bag closed, and then thrust it over his head. He held it for 15 may be 20 seconds.





Then he knelt in the center of the circle and repeated the process. With each circle, the fragments increased in size and the bag grew substantially heavier. At first, what was trivial--the hoisting of the bag and holding it up to the light--became non-trivial, became challenging.





A feat of effortless ritual became a feat of physical strength and endurance. The offering was uncertain. The tension was palpable. Would he lift it? Drop it? Fall? Collapse.


Holding 5 rings of cinder block overhead


Attempting to hoist all 6 rings of cinder block 

After the final circle of fragments had been gathered and the bag was secured closed, Yates struggled to lift the bundle.



Sweat beaded on his face. He breathed deeply, heavily, grunted, dropped the bag heavily. A small cloud of cinder block dust exploded from the bag. Redoubling his effort, he crouched deeper, struggled vigorously, and dropped it again. He tried a few more times, failing each time and then walked off leaving the bag in the middle of the stage.


The end of Remembrance of Me 

At the conclusion of Yates piece, we filed past the bag of cinder blocks and up the stair to the attic to observe Manola Maldonado's performance, Tea Party. In the darkened attic, Maldonado stood dressed in a frilly short dress holding a green ball over head with unwound magnetic tape attached to her and still connected to their cassettes. She lowered the ball and walked in a small circle dragging the tapes behind her. Then she sat on a blanket among strawberry short cakes, tea, and dolls. La-la singing, she goes through the motions of hosting a tea party and then she dumps powdered sugar over everything.


Manola being mother at tea time 

The dim lighting, the cramped setting, the props, the costuming gave the piece a hallucinatory Alice-and-Wonderland feel, which was obviously intentional. Where the piece lost me was in the connections among the magnetic tape beginning, the tea party middle, and the powdered sugar end.


powdered sugar makes everything better 

My small mind was unable to connect them in any other way than slightly surreal blend. And may be that's as far as I was supposed to.

Into the light and back to the second floor, we went. Jade performed Questions of a Victim. It began with her crouched on the floor in the manner of a child, writing. After a minute or two of intense scribbling, she approached the audience and asked, "Why are they so mean?" Not indicating who they were and thus leaving us to ponder if we were "they" or she was they or they were "they" as we all self-righteously suspected of everyone else but of course we.

She then put on a black shirt and approached the audience again. "Why won't they leave me alone? Shut up!"


Jade 

Next she donned a white shirt and started singing quietly John Lennon's "Imagine". "Imagine all the people..." and then wordlessly hummed the melody.


Jade donning a white shirt, transforming into OK 

Until she stopped and then half-shouted, "Don't let anyone bring you down. Look at me, I turned out OK." Finally, she laughed in a manner that indicated that her character was anything but OK. But, we already knew that and turned away as was expected.

Next up was Jonatan Lopezperforming My Filthy Self. Dressed in sunglass, a white t-shirt, and jeans, he started out strutting down the middle of the room (think Tom Cruise in Risky Business) on an improvised paper runway.


Shame Swagger or Shame Strut? 


kneeling...but not in prayer 

At the end of the runway were two jars of paint: one with red paint and one with black. He knelt between the jars, removed his sunglasses and t-shirt, neatly placed them on the paper, and painted his mouth black.



Next, Lopez removed his pants and lay them out to form a silhouette of a body.



Then he took the black paint brush and began to paint his genitals: black dick, black ball sack.



Once you paint it black... Lopez took his time. Meticulous and thorough, he obviously wanted to give the audience time to observe and reflect.



Black dicked and black balled (I can't help of thinking of Al Jolson...Jade's performance in CLAS 2), he then grabbed the jar of red paint and attempted to pour it on his ass. I'm assuming he was aiming for his asshole (and all the weighted metaphors that it carries).



Lopez then proceeded to pour the red paint on the clothing silhouette at the crotch and near the heart and neck.



Once he'd stained red himself and the clothing to his satisfaction, he picked up a sign board that read "Take my picture" and hung it from his neck with a cord. The board had a hole at crotch level and he stuck his black dick and balls through the hole.



Finally, he circumnavigated the room so that anyone wanting to photograph his filthy self could.
I'm not a psychologist or a psychotherapist, but I don't think that you needed to be to understand this piece. At least symbolically for this performance, it was safe to assume that Black = bad, Red = Blood (and not in a good way), genitalia = self. Lopez showed his shame, so to speak, and the act played our as cathartic for the artist but it was not transferable, at least not for me. His shame was not my shame. (And I've got plenty of shame.) The piece didn't draw me into it to share in his shame or its absolution. It simply showed it to me and gave me and the rest of the audience the opportunity to Instagram it.

As if on cue, Jana Whatley appeared in a black top and black tights and performed Steps through the remnants of Lopez's performance. It consisted of her walking backward in progression of two steps backward, one step forward. It was subtle, quiet, consistent, almost comic in its physical simplicity. In contrast to Lopez's performance, the minimalism served as a palette cleanser.



Whatley walked the second floor, two step backwards and one step forward, and then proceeded downstairs past Koomah performing his durational piece, Waiting. Koomah stood in a full length sleeveless black dress and black veil. Noiseless and still. Audience members late to the show walked past him one by one with the same apprehension that you have in a haunted house, anticipating something and yet not knowing exactly what or when. Their individual but similar reactions amusingly hypnotized me.


Koomah Waiting 

"Hello?..." David Collins voice broke Koomah's spell. He stumbled into the performance space wearing bubble wrap and a grimace and nothing else. Then fell to the floor and began rolling around, possibly flailing, but it's hard to flail freely when encased in bubble wrap. His hand, holding a cell phone, was wrapped to his ear. As he continued to talk to the phone, it became clear that he had called a suicide prevention/crisis hotline.


It's a bird, it's a plane...


It's David Collins in the latest in bubble wrap fashion

Through a humorous monologue we learned that his character
  • is 50
  • is depressed
  • is incompetent at suicide (plenty of kerosene but no match)
  • quit his lucrative job (would rather die than work for Chevron)
  • is depressed by his mortality and it's possibly killing him
  • is currently doing a performance art piece
  • is indignant that his councilor is in Bangalore and that his existential crisis has been outsourced lives in a commune, and
  • concludes that he should talk to people and may be they could help (as opposed to a call center worker who would probably prefer to diagnose his printer error but didn't make a high enough score on that test to work for that company).



Then Collins took his own advice and he talked to the crowd asking them to strip him naked and pop the bubbles.


Note to self: dress in bubble wrap if you want beautiful people to strip you naked. 

And they did. I'm not sure they found meaning in the act, but they got to bare skin.

Once Collins had been stripped and all his bubbles popped, Koomah placed a chair in the middle of the room and Jonatan Lopez sat in it. In this piece called Transference, Lopez sat and thought of a painful memory. Hopefully, it was the one that inspired him to paint his dick black in My Filthy Self because I don't think he's done working through that stuff. Koomah then knelt behind Lopez for about a minute. Then Koomah moved in front of Lopez, reached out and touched his face.


Here, my inner pentacostal minister was saying, "Give me your shame brother Jonatan" 

With his eyes closed, Koomah then tilted his face towards Lopez's and breathed deeply until he suddenly let go and walked away.


And here I felt like yelling "Out demon! Out!" 

As you might have gathered from my photo captions, I understood the concept but I didn't feel it. To be fair to Koomah, I've been to waaaaayyyyy too many charismatic church services (I call them "freak out for Jesus" sessions) for this subtle form of transference to have an effect on me. I also don't know if it worked for Lopez or even if it was supposed to or what that would have looked like. The audience, however, seemed accepting of the ambiguity.

Jonatan moved himself and the chair out of the performance area and then Sway Youngston unceremoniously dumped three bags of leaves on the floor. She did it with impunity and she could because they were locally sourced from the Montrose, the Heights, and a communal living space entitled Urth House.


Sway laying down the leaves 

She then cleared a circular space in the middle of the pile and began her piece entitled, What's Left? She then arranged on the floor a bunch of clay spirit animals that audience members had been invited to make when they entered the bar.


Clearing a space 

She plucked one up and asked "Whose spirit animal is this?" A man claimed it and she asked him to come into the circle. She lay on her back, placed a 2' x 2' plywood square on her torso, placed the spirit animal on the square, and instructed him to smash his spirit animal with a plastic hammer. He did. First with a tentative swing, then with a more forceful one.


Caution: Spirit animal slayer at work 

Youngston repeated this process with several more spirit animals and their creators until there was a sizable lump of clay on the board.


Spirit crushing spans genders. 

Then she gathered the clay from the board on stomach, and molded it to her face until it was completely covered. Breathing heavily, she searched for the hammer with her hands. After she found it, she struck her belly, hard. Once. Twice. Five times.


Sway covered in spirit animal remains 

Next, she took the handle of the hammer and inserted it into her mouth. (I'm hesitant to use a religious or politically biased description here, but if I use a pornographic one, # 1. One will comment about it and # 2. Everyone will know exactly what I'm talking about.) Basically, she deep-throated the hammer handle and held it there for half a minute or a full minute. Finally, she turned to the side and spit it out.


Sway swallowing the spirit animal slayer 

What's left but to interpret the piece as one about spirit crushing. And not the corporate/geo-political/material world (a favorite scapegoat in a culture that simultaneously insists on personal autonomy) crushing our spirit, but we (I'll join the audience for this one) volunteering to and then gleefully or at least willingly crushing our own spirits. At the end, I was uneasy with the piece but not sure why. Was it a little too easy or a little too close to home?

At that point, it was intermission and with all the shame and spirit crushing that I'd endured, I needed a drink to lift my spirits. I headed down to the bar and almost walked into the arms of Shanon Adams performing one of the durational pieces. I'll christen it Ballet d' Ugs, because I lack imagination and she was wearing Ug boots as she proceeded to dance through out the bar.


Ninja? No. Shanon Adams

Adams moved through the bar gracefully. Her movements were deliberate, hinting at an overall choreography.



Nevertheless, she flowed around drunk patrons and unbalanced art reviewers with too much equipment as if our movements had been anticipated and incorporated into the piece.



In bars, I often stumble upon people, but never so gracefully. I'm guessing some of my fellow patrons there for a drink instead of the performance art had the same experience.

Another durational performance that I encountered during the intermission was Neil Ellis OrtsTell Me Where It Hurts. Dressed in a blue Lycra body suit complete with hood and mask, he approached bar patrons and audience members with a sharpee and invited them to "map their pain." He instructed me to locate the place on his body that corresponded to a place on my body where I experienced pain, circle the area, and then to rate the pain on a scale of 1 to 10.


Neal selling Pain Mapping 

The piece was inspired by a story he heard on NPR about a woman who told people about her cancer. This process attempted to take this communication one step further, to physically map it, to make it that much more real.


Pain Mapping was very popular. 

While I mapped my pain, two audience member were recruited to duct tape the stairs. Not completely, but enough. One drew a yellow line of duct tape up the stairs and another drew a pink line. Neither were told the purpose of their tape lines. Then the artist Hilary Scullane attempted to navigate the stairs with her hands in constant contact with the yellow line, her feet with the pink one.



Duct tape guide lines 

Scullane began at the bottom of the stairs and worked her way up. Avant Garden being Avant Garden, she had to navigate around the bar patrons who either didn't know she was performing or didn't care.


Scullane commences 

The piece references a Bruce Nauman performance, Walking in an Exaggerated Manner. (I asked. I'm that clueless.) But it extends it.



In Scullane's orchestration, the act of "walking the tape" becomes acrobatic and gymnastic.



Like Yates' piece, and Whatley's, it is minimal, non-narrative.





And yet, it is also extremely evocative because at the end, you don't just understand the piece, you can directly relate to it, and feel it.

Next, I got nailed by Nikki Thornton performing her piece, Nail Me. In this performance, Nikki donned a nail spiked bikini top and shorts and then shook, shimmied, and scraped along the wall, along the stair banister, against the mirror...


Nikki Thornton and her doppelganger ( photo by Hilary Scullane)

...the bar, and the patrons, of which I was one. The visual and tactile aspects of the piece were obvious and a little scary to some of the non-audience bar patrons. I saw at least one guy take a very big, intentional step away from Nikki as she slither-scraped from the stairs.


Me nailing the butt bump with Nikki Thornton ( photo by Hilary Scullane) 

The piece also had a subtle aural component that was barely audible. However, if you concentrated, or were near enough to participate in it, you could hear the nails on glass, on wood, and on fabric.
Having been nailed, it was time head up stairs for the final series of performance. The first one was an untitled piece by David Graeve. It started with him standing in the middle of the floor facing a woman. They were holding hands and wearing safety goggles and protective ear muffs. Between them was a large red plastic balloon/sack. A third person flipped on an electric pump and the balloon began to inflate.


Performance art foreplay 

As the balloon began to inflate it pushed the two artists apart. They struggled to move closer.



They struggled to embrace. Sometimes enveloped in the red plastic. Sometimes suspended by it appearing to ride it, appearing to hump it.



The success of their endeavor played out in cycles at times their mouths, their bodies were inches apart. At other times, they struggled to hold on to each other and you had a sense that one might lose its grip and going flying into the audience.



Ultimately the piece came to an end. (whether because of a Continuum-based time limit or per Graeve, it wasn't clear.) They wrestled to a stalemate without a climatic embrace or disbursing or casting away.


The metaphor for relationships seemed obvious enough, but how one interpreted the metaphor was another matter. Other than being a generic symbol for a divisive entity, what did the plastic red balloon represent? Society? Household debt/financial ruin (being in the red)? The role of petrochemical byproducts (it was plastic and this is Houston) in the relationship/bedroom? (I'm leaving you for my vibrator. It doesn't whine as much and it makes more money.) A red herring, literally (dietary restrictions drive us apart) and metaphorically? An over inflated concept of love? A red sports car?

I'm not sure, and I'm not sure if Graeve intended for the audience to determine that with any certainty. Regardless, participating in the performance and making it work, like a relationship, looked exhausting.

Y.E. Torres was next with Muscle Dance. I first encountered Torres at a belly dancing performance. So, mentally (that is because I have a small rather intransigent mind) I classify her as a belly dancer which is limiting in all the wrong stereotypical ways.



First of all, she doesn't have a belly. Second, although she incorporates belly dancing moves, along with classical ballet and modern dance moves, in her performances in a way that ballet and modern dancers don't, her performance lies outside the genre of belly dancing.


Third, she choreographs her pieces to non-traditional belly dancing music.



In Muscle Dance, the soundtrack consisted of mouth noises, electronic pops, synthetic minimalism. Her movements were equally slow, graceful, and intentional.





Like all dance-centric performances, it's just something you have to experience. (Unfortunately, I can't find a video of it I can share.)

Shifting from non-verbal, elegiac to the prosaic, Julia Claire Wallace took the stage and announced that she wanted a revolution. She signaled to the audience to gather around her in her kindly, unassuming Mr. Roger's style. We flocked around her like obedient school children. "I want a revolution." She declared and they echoed. "Say it like you mean it." They repeated it louder because bigger is better and louder passes for conviction. (This is Texas after all). A woman, Kira, began to drum on a table. Lead by Wallace, we chanted/sang "I want change." The performance morphed into a spontaneous revolution song that built and then ended. Was that it? Was that revolutionary to you? Apparently, in Ms. Wallace's neighborhood it was.


Julie Claire Wallace, the "Mr. Rogers" of Houston performance art 

Wallace again...I meant to photograph the drummer, but revolutions are not conducive to photography.


In the final act of the evening, Jajah Graytook the floor and made a makeshift alter. It consisted of cards, books, three glasses of water, cloths (scarfs/shawls/do rags/bandannas).


Jajah making an altar 

He asked the audience "Can you imagine a world so clean and pure?" He then emptied his pockets of money. Coins spilled on to the floor, bounced, rolled. Gray stomped a beat with his feet. The audience picked it up.



Gray performed and held a yoga bridge until I thought he'd collapse. Instead, he began dancing and vaulting over the altar. After a few passes, he partially deconstructed the altar and offered parts to the audience while singing query, "Can you imagine a world so clean and pure?" The audience joined in. A dog, that had been silently present for all the performances, suddenly barked. Gray started the crowd foot stomping and then began singing, in what I don't think was English. (But it was late, I'd had a few drinks, and had been nailed, so I'm not testifying to any of this.)



Gray drank from 1 of the 3 glasses of water, shouted, and then the performance ended.


Jajah ends 

 To me, Grays performances, similar to Y.E. Torres, are lyrical and mystical. The intention was not always clear and segments didn't always cohere but there was the physicality of them and the oblique content created ample space for me to get comfortable in them.

The evening of performances over, I headed downstairs in to Julia Claire Wallace durational performance Dirt Massage.


Julie Claire Wallace in Dirt Massage
 
After standing for 4+ hours, I could have used a massage. Nevertheless, she wasn't giving she was receiving. The handwritten sign by her side read, "I truly need a massage."



Hilary Scullane fulfilling wishes Wallace provided the dirt and the massage oil. The audience was expected to provide the labor. A couple of Continuum members applied oil liberally and pressed and pushed the dirt into Wallace's back, shoulders, arms, legs.



I took a turn making mud pies on Wallace's back and then kneading, rubbing, and pressing it into her flesh.



Relaxing for her. Raw, minimal, perhaps even infantile for us. And yet, satisfying in the way that the most successful performances of the evening were. Minimal and primal and direct.


Share

Landeros Pleads Guilty

$
0
0
Robert Boyd


Uriel Landeros, in jail for being a malicious idiot

Uriel Landeros, who spray-painted a stencil on Picasso's Woman in  a Red Armchair at the Menil last year, has pleaded guilty to vandalizing the painting. As part of his plea deal, he will be sentenced to two years in prison, of which he has already served five months. I have to say that this does not seem like a very good plea deal on the face of it. The DA dropped the criminal mischief charge and kept the vandalism charge--his sentence could have been longer. But let's face it--the DA didn't have much incentive to cut a good deal because Landeros had 1) been video-taped in the act, 2) bragged about his crime in a statement posted on YouTube.

All this information comes from an article in the Houston Chronicle. The article does not mention restitution to the Menil for costs incurred. I assume that Landeros couldn't pay it in any case, but it seems like he should be required to make some kind of monetary restitution.

As for Landeros' post-prison life, I have only one suggestion: stay away from moronic exploitative hucksters like James Perez.

I hope that this is the last Uriel Landeros post for a long, long time. If you are interested in background on this case, see these earlier posts:


The idiot in the act

Share

Pan Recommends for the week of May 23 to May 29

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

Houston's art world is taking the long weekend off for the most part. (I'll be using this time to check out a few shows I've missed. Or I'll go to the beach.) But there is never a completely art-free weekend in Houston. Here are a few things happening this weekend that we're interested in.

THURSDAY


Hollis Frampton, still from Critical Mass

An Aurora Picture ShowOpen Screen Night Double Header: One Second Film Festival and Hollis Frampton Films, 7:30. A film festival of one-second films (don't expect a lot of characterization and plot) from TCU, curated by Nick Bontrager, and a selection of 16 mm films from the pioneering avant garde filmmaker, Hollis Frampton.

FRIDAY

 
a heroic Hello Kitty by Erik Martinez

The Mouthless-Kat: Hello Kitty & Friends! featuring Alex Barber, Alice Le, Andrea Rodriguez, Blue130, Blue Rooster Customs, Browncoat, Catfish, Enma Castro, Erik Martinez, John Paul Luna, Katsola, Lisa Chow, Lizbeth Ortiz, Lizzette Gonzalez, Nesreen Hussain Alawami, Sophia Rose Luna and Veronica Vega at East End Studio Gallery. Art has many time-tested subjects that always work--Jesus, naked ladies, bluebonnets, etc. Hello Kitty is the latest (and greatest?) candidate for eternal artistic muse.

SATURDAY


Joëlle Verstraeten monoprint

Joëlle Verstraeten: Allegro, Moderato at Gallery Jatad, 3–6 pm, (runs May 25 through June 27). Somehow, Gallery Jatad opened without me hearing about it. This gallery specializes in African and contemporary art (I hope that means they will also show African contemporary art), and is run by the husband and wife team of Lisa Qualls (an artist we've reviewed before) and African art specialist Matt Scheiner.



Call it Street Art, Call it Fine Art, Call it What You Know with Anat Ronen, Lee Washington, Michael C. Rodriguez, Dual, Skeez181, Deck WGF, Sebastien “MR. D” Boileau, The Death Head, Eyesore, Empire I.N.S., Daniel Anguilu, Ana María, ACK!, Tatum One, Angel Quesada, Sode, Vizie and KC Ortiz at Station Museum of Contemporary Art, 7 pm. A big show of street art is an excellent way to kick off summer, don't you think?



Share

Big Five Oh, part 2: Frieze

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

After we went to Cutlog, my nephew Ford and I had some lunch and then headed over towards 34th Street and the East River. This is where Frieze's water taxis were docking, and also where we would be meeting my friends LM and DC. LM and DC are two collectors who I have known for a long time (before they were art collectors, in fact). LM had secured four passes for Frieze on Thursday, which was a "preview" day. LM and DC are quite serious art collectors who represent a class of collector one rarely hears about. We usually read about the Steven Cohen type of art collector--the hedge fund guys, the Russian oligarchs, the titans of industry, etc. But people who spend four or maybe five figures for a piece of art are much more common. It's these collectors I know. For LM and DC, Frieze was mostly about looking around (as Frieze art tends to be very high-ticket work), LM did buy work at Pulse, and DC came very close doing so as well.

LM and DC look remarkably different--LM wears a supremely casual uniform of shorts, Tshirt and ever-present messenger bag. DC came from his work that day in a tailored suit and he favors custom-made shirts. Their tastes are different, too. They noted over the course of the next couple of days that neither of them had a single artist in common in their collections (although as we shall see, this may change). But as collectors, they approach work in a very similar way--they are deliberate and thoughtful. They think a very long time before committing. They do the research they need to feel comfortable with their purchases. If you are an artist, this is the kind of person you should want as a collector.


LM and DC at Frieze

As for me, my income puts me mostly in the looky-loo category. I collect work I love when I can, which is rarely. I didn't expect to buy any art at these fairs. (As it happened, I did end up buying a piece of art--but not at Frieze.) For me, Frieze was like a vast, uncurated museum of contemporary art. There are so many pieces that I found myself looking for two or three pieces that have some superficial similarity that I can declare to be a trend. As it turns out, you can make lots of "fake trend" groupings with the art at Frieze. It's hard to be completely original. Here are some of the "trends" I saw at Frieze.

Belts



Monica Bonvicini, Belts Couch, 2004, black leather men's belts, iron, fabric, parquet, 21 2/3 x 63 x 78 3/4 inches at Johan König


Mathieu Mercier, Untitled (Belt), 2013, Leather belt, plexiglass box, plinth, 62.9 x 13.3 x 13.3 inches at Mehdi Chouakri

Two isn't enough to be a trend, but still I was struck by the fact that there were two separate belt sculptures.

Elaborate Sculptures of Disposable Containers


Jürgen Drescher, Moving Box Freestanding 1, 2012, aluminum cast, 41 3/4 x 17 1/2 x 14 inches at Galerie Rodolphe Janssen


Andreas Lolis, Untitled, 2013, marble, 10 x 72 x 64 cm at The Breeder


Andreas Lolis, Untitled (detail), 2013, marble, 10 x 72 x 64 cm at The Breeder



Robert Whitman, Garbage Bag, 1964/2013, installation of 2013 transferred reconstruction: original 16 mm film loop to DVD, color, silent. "Pioneer" supermarket bag, portable miniprojector with memory stick, frosted plexiglass lens, fiberglass cast, media pedestal, 16 x 12 x 6.5 inches at Air de Paris

I admit that Robert Whitman's Garbage Bag is not really like Andreas Lolis's piece and Jürgen Drescher's moving box, both of which sculpt garbage out of fine, permanent materials (marble and aluminum respectively). But I really liked Garbage Bag, so I include it here. As an aside, if you're a collector, how do you keep Garbage Bag? Paper bags are not exactly known for their permanence. This is an issue I will return to later.

Political Art

Political art is never really a "trend," but is instead a constant. There is always someone doing it. But you expect to see it in non-profit spaces, not in giant indoor art markets like Frieze. Galerie Lelong decided to do a whole booth full of "political art," which amused me greatly. I mean, it wasn't like they were using this art to make a political statement (some of the art referred to political situations from long in the past). For them, "political art" was just a programmatic decision. It could have been "minimal art" or "Brazilian art" (they were, in fact, also showing a lot of Brazilian art).


Leon Golub, The Assassin, 1972, acrylic on Belgian linen, 92 x 57 inches


Nancy Spero, South Africa, 1981, handprinting and typewriter collage on paper, 26.5 x 40.5 inches


Nancy Spero, Argentina, 1981, handprinting and typewriter collage on paper, 26.5 x 40.5 inches

So naturally they included pieces by Leon Golub and Nancy Spero, whose expressionist political works are classic.s


Cildo Meireles, Tiradentes: Totem-Monument to the Political Prisoner, 1970, suite of six black and white photographs, 4.75 x 7 inches each

Cildo Meireles's piece, Tiradentes: Totem-Monument to the Political Prisoner, comes from a time when Brazil was under an increasingly harsh military dictatorship (although one that left artists alone, for the most part, perhaps recognizing their utter impotence as far as politics goes). The title is excellent: Tiradentes was a Brazilian independence plotter who was captured and hanged in 1792. He is a national hero and one whose name the military dictatorship couldn't really outlaw (unlike figures like, for example, Che Guevarra).


Yoko Ono, Imagine No Fracking at Galerie Lelong

Yoko Ono, with a little help from her dead hubby, took a bold stand and commanded us to imagine no fracking. So I did: I imagined us importing huge amounts of liquified natural gas from Middle Eastern despots; I imagined natural gas costing $13 per thousand cubic feet (instead of about $4.50) and poor people suffering in the cold because they couldn't afford to heat their homes; I imagined thousands of working-class American roughnecks and roustabouts out of work. I also imagined how funny it would be if this piece were shown at the Texas Contemporary Art Fair or the Houston Fine Art Fair.

But real politics did surprisingly intrude into the proceedings at Frieze. Frieze has made itself infamous for using only non-union labor, which in a heavily union town like New York is quite a ballsy move. (Ironically, the art fairs at Brown Convention Center in Houston both use union labor.) Normally this fact doesn't seem to bother the exhibitors and certainly doesn't bother the rich glitterati in attendance. But artists might be a little annoyed, and one of them, Andrea Bowers, spoke out.



Two copies of the letters were posted next to huge blowups of pro-socialist/union political cartoons from the 19th century by Walter Crane.



Her other artwork seemed to have a political edge as well.


Andrea Bowers at Susanne Vielmetter Los Angeles Projects

But to me, work like this at Frieze is just another high-end consumer product. Her letter, on the other hand, addresses a political situation that has to do directly with Frieze. You can't be at Frieze, see this letter, and say you support the unions because just by being there you are supporting Frieze management. This letter forces you to realize your own complicity--and therefore to take a side. Compare this to Yoko Ono's Imagine No Fracking, which requires nothing of the viewer. The Frieze visitor can say, "Oh, yes, I am against fracking," because it cost him nothing. Fracking is something that some people do in some distant parts of flyover country. But when Andrea Bowers calls attention to a bad policy by Frieze, she's talking about the guy whose job it was to mop this spill up.



I found that hard to ignore, but I don't know about the average Frieze-goer.

Porn

But more of a trend was art that seemed related to pornography. This was work that took pornographic imagery (whether it was already existing or made up by the artist is not always clear)and transformed it in some way to make it art. None of the transformations were minimal--this wasn't just someone putting a pornographic video into a gallery and making it art through the act of recontextualizing it. These pieces were substantially, visually changed.


Thomas Ruff, chromogenic print with Diasec at David Zwirner


Thomas Ruff, chromogenic print with Diasec

Like these huge blurry photos by Thomas Ruff. They were all called "nudes" followed by a four digit alphanumeric code. According to a really thoughtful review in The Guardian by Geoff Dyer, they were taken from pornographic websites. Dyer points out, "Ruff's decision to call these pictures Nudes encourages us to see them as part of – conceivably as culmination of and commentary on – a major tradition in western art that has cloaked itself in any number of religious, mythological, aesthetic and moral guises." And I think this can be said of all the porn-related work at Frieze.


Johannes Kahrs, Untitled (kliene freundin), 2008, oil on canvas, 167 x 107 cm at Xeno X

With photos, the line between porn and art is blurry. After all, almost all porn is lens based. (And I would add that very little if any porn is painted in oil paints, a medium which at this point in history is in the exclusive domain of "art"). So how do we look at this piece by Johannes Kahrs? Oil painting of a nude woman=art. Legs spread for a beaver shot=porn. The ambiguity is delicious, and his painting technique is superb.


Richard Prince, untitled, 2012, ink jet and acrylic on canvas, 63 1/4 x 50 1/8 inches at Sadie Coles

Richard Prince plays up the ambiguity by reusing an older pornographic image. Pornography+time lessens the impact of porn. Nostalgia turns something that was furtive and shameful in its time into something completely acceptable and even fun. (Bettie Page, for example.)



Kendell Geers, Mouthing off, 1993, 9 TV sets and 9 dvds, steel shelves at Galerie Rodolphe Jansssen

South African artist Kendell Geers had several pieces at Frieze, including Mouthing off. But only Mouthing off dealt with porn. Each screen showed kaleidescopic images that only revealed themselves to be porn after close examination. Which I did. I pointed this piece out to DC and he declared that he found it "disturbing." It a piece of art can get a rise out of someone, I guess it has accomplished something.


Nicole Eisenman at Susanne Vielmetter Los Angeles Projects

Sometimes it's just the pose that recalls pornography. This crudely depicted figure by Nicole Eisenman is showing us her asshole--as so many porn photos do. I liked that she depicted the asshole as a little asterisk shape. It reminded me of Kurt Vonnegut's drawing of an asshole in Breakfast of Champions.


John Wesley, untitled, 2011-2012, acrylic n canvas, 52 3/4 x 31 3/4 inches at Matthew Marks

John Wesley had a series of nude paintings at Matthew Marks which while not "hard core" were obviously meant to look like pornographic pictures. The woman above posing suggestively witht he intend of showing off her breasts. (But what makes the picture very erotic is the wedding ring.)

Vinyl Records

I don't think vinyl record art is really a trend, but who knows? In an era where it is supremely easy for artists to make recordings and play them through digital devices, there is something about any artwork that involves a vinyl record that makes me take notice (Michael A. Morris's A Gentle Mind Confused, for example).


Renata Lucas, Longplay at A Gentil Carioca

Renata Lucas is a Brazilian artist who specializes in "architectural interventions." And to display Longplay requires an architectural intervention of a very physical sort--a turntable has to be installed into the floor with a wall on top of it. This is one of those works that is a challenge to a clollector, because not only does she buy the work, she has to build a wall for it. But since I'm not building a wall, I had the option to just enjoy it--which I did. (And let me add here that her Rip de Janeiro gallery, A Gentil Carioca, has the best website I've ever seen for a gallery. Apparently Ernesto Neto is one of the gallery's owners.)


Jack Goldstien, untitled at Galerie Buchholz

I really want to listen to a record called The Quivering Earth.


Jack Early, Jack Early's Ear Candy Machine, 2009, lacquered wood, 1920s Victrola horn, turntable, vinyl record, plexi, black lights. 8 original tracks, all songs by Jack Early "with a little help from his friends" at McCaffrey Fine Art

This was part of a huge Jack Early extravaganza, including two giant installations.


Jack Early, Jack Early's Ear Candy Machine, 2009, lacquered wood, 1920s Victrola horn, turntable, vinyl record, plexi, black lights. 8 original tracks, all songs by Jack Early "with a little help from his friends" at McCaffrey Fine Art


Jack Early, Jack Early's Ear Candy Machine, 2009, lacquered wood, 1920s Victrola horn, turntable, vinyl record, plexi, black lights. 8 original tracks, all songs by Jack Early "with a little help from his friends" at McCaffrey Fine Art


Jack Early, Paul (John Is the One That Is Dead, Actually), 2011, light green paint, wood, poster board and plexi, 82 x 24 x 33 inches

I will admit that this made me laugh.


Jack Early, Linda McCartney (What Do You Call a Dog with Wings), 2011, pink paint, wood, poster board and plexi, 48 x 24 x 16 inches

But I wondered what collector would really want to own (much less display) such mean-spirited works like Paul and Linda McCartney. Still, they made me laugh! (The Linda McCartney joke was one that I heard back in the 70s--even then I felt guilty for laughing at at.)


Jack Early, WWJD, cross, foorprints, clouds, original audio track: Hey Jesus, 2012, printed Lexasm lights, plywood, muslin, lentils, printed cotton

Ultimately, it seems like Early has become enamored with certain aspects of 70s pop culture, but can't refrain from making fun of it. I was amused briefly, but it seems like very transitory stuff. That said, I couldn't hear the songs in the loud crowd--maybe they have merit.

How Do You Display and Conserve These Pieces?

OK, I'm veering away from trends to something that was repeatedly on my mind at Frieze, artworks that would be a challenge to own. I've touched on this a bit with the Robert Whitman and Renata Lucas. And obviously, if we think of the art world as a whole, lots of pieces of art are temporary and not really meant to be conserved. They aren't meant to be collected. There may be some collectible residue--photographic documentation, for example. But to me, it's surprising to see such pieces at Frieze, which I think of (naively?) as a bazaar for selling very valuable collectible merchandise to well-heeled collectors, right? So how do you collect this piece by Chadwick Rantanen?


Chadwick Rantanen, untitled at the Standard


Chadwick Rantanen, untitled at the Standard

This installation by Chadwick Rantanen consists of plastic bins filled with water with thin films of oil (oil paint?) floating on them. The film ends up making very intriguing designs, which I assume are mostly random. Definitely an interesting and thought provoking piece. Obviously it can't be transported. If you were a collector, you'd have to have it recreated in your space. But how long does it last? How long can you have oil floating in water? What happens to the design over time?


Tony Feher, (Singer of Many), 2008, 31 glass bottled with screw caps, water, food color and painted wood shelf, 8.25 x 108.5 x 3.5 inches at Sikkema Jenkins

And with Tony Feher, I've often wondered how long does food color last? I assume it's organic and can therefore probably rot or get moldy. Maybe decay is prevented (or at least delayed) by virture of being in a closed bottle.


Foreground: Joseph Grigely, We Need a Drinking Song, 2012, crystal urethane, 75 x 55 x 55 cm. Background: Carsten Höller, The Smoke of the Melon, 1994, watermelon, pipe, 30 x 30 x 35 cm

We Need a Drinking Song by Joseph Grigely will probably last for centuries if taken care of, but Carsten Höller's The Smoke of the Melon is made with a real watermelon, which will go bad. So if you're a collector who owns this, do you just replace the melon every now and then?

Houston Artists

Another thing I'm on the lookout for at these places are any artists from Houston. At any given time, I suppose, there are some artists from Houston who have managed to flicker across the consciousness of the art market. These are the ones whose work one would be most likely to see at Frieze. This time around, it was Trenton Doyle Hancock and Mark Flood, both of whom have had big gallery shows in New York in the past year.


 Mark Flood at Stuart Shave

This Mark Flood is pretty but also pretty typical. I saw better examples a week later in Austin at Russell Etchen's show of work from his personal collection.


Trenton Doyle Hancock (clockwise from upper right): Red Head, 2013. acrylic and mixed media on canvas; The Veil, 2013, acrylic and mixed media on canvas; It's Between You and the Dark What Happened in Central Park, 2013, acrylic and mixed media on canvas at James Cohan Gallery

James Cohan Gallery brought quite a bit of Trenton Doyle Hancock, which was very nice to see.

What did LM and DC like? Their tastes, as mentioned, are not identical. LM expressed admiration for some video work, which I'm pretty sure is not to DC's taste. But both of them like Andreas Gursky.


LM and I discuss Gursky


Andreas Gursky at Sprüth Magers


Andreas Gursky at Sprüth Magers

These photos of reflections on water were pure magic.

We were there for 6 hours. Then for some crazy reason, we decided to walk to Harlem. Here's what the Frieze tent on Randall Island looks like from the Robert F. Kennedy Bridge.




Share

Tattooed Squeegee Boys

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

I went to two print events on April 26 and 27 A lot of prints I see these days art quite genteel and pleasant. Printmaking's evolved into a rather polite artform. But it wasn't always the case--look at Minotauromachy, on view in the Picasso show at the MFAH. Look at the nasty satirical prints of 18th century England. And it wasn't the case at Burning Bones Press and the Continental Club.


Tom Huck, Pile-O-Poon from the portfolio Hillbilly Kama Sutra, 2010-12, linoleum cut print, 16" x 16"

Tom Huck is a woodcut and linoleum cut artist from St. Louis. He had a show at Burning Bones Press, a printmaking studio on Yale that is run by Carlos Hernandez. Hernandez is known for his silkscreen gig posters and music images--you might have seen them in exhibits at Cactus Records. As you can see by Huck's work and Hernandez's (in the links), this is neither polite nor genteel. Nor is it academic nor does it consciously operate within a particular theoretical system. It makes no pretense at being avant garde. It is not intellectual nor is it middle-class. It is not the kind of art typically shown in a high-street gallery. Sometimes it's called low-brow art. Whatever the economic origins of the artists, it self-consciously adopts a working class stance. And the price of much of the work is pretty working class, too. You can buy a Carlos Hernandez print from his Etsy shop for $25, although many cost quite a bit more.


Sad Tom Huck

We were chatting about George Jones, who passed away that day, and I asked Huck to pose for a photo. He had a big grin, but I said, "Don't smile so much--George Jones is dead." So that's Tom Huck thinkin' about George Jones. His print operation is called Evil Prints, and he counts as his influences "Albrecht Durer, Jose Guadalupe Posada, R. Crumb and Honore Daumier."


Tom Huck, Stag Night from the portfolio Hillbilly Kama Sutra, 2010-12, linoleum cut print, 16" x 16"


Tom Huck, Pleezing from the portfolio Hillbilly Kama Sutra, 2010-12, linoleum cut print, 16" x 32"


Tom Huck, Hillbilly Kama Sutra portfolio, 2010-12, linoleum cut print, 16" x 16"

The Hillbilly Kama Sutra was a commission for Blab!, a semi-regular periodical devoted to "lowbrow" art and comics. I love the portfolio cover--wood veneer with a glory hole.

The next day, there was an all-day event called "It Came From the Bayou" at the Continental Club, cosponsored by Burning Bones Press and AIGA Houston,  the local designers' organization. Printmakers came from all over the country to show off and sell their work. Everyone had tables, so it felt a bit like a comic convention.


The Continental Club taken over by printmakers


The pool tables in the back were used for display--Tom Huck's table is in the foreground.


From Tom Huck's table


The prints included their share of skateboard art

While a lot of the art included stand-alone pieces, a lot of it was in service of something else--gig posters, skateboard deck designs, etc. The functional art reflects the culture on display--they do rock posters and skateboard art because these are things they're into. (For some print artists, there is no separation between their enthusiasms and their art--the Fort Thunder artists in Providence in the 90s did silk-screened gig posters, hosted music shows, and played in bands themselves.)

The default medium is silkscreen. Silkscreens are quick to do (useful if you have to do a gig poster for a show next week) and have a poster-like visual punch. Obviously silkscreen posters have been associated with rock shows since the sixties, with a revival in the 90s when people like Kozik and Coop came along. But I was surprised at how many woodcut artists were here. If silkscreen is the perfect print medium for designers, woodcut is perfect for showing off one's drawing prowess.

But what I didn't see much of were etchings, engravings or stone lithography. My guess is that those print media are not ideal for the kinds of prints displayed here--large and with maximum graphic impact.



Matt Rebholz signing a comic for me

Matt Rebholz was the exception to the silkscreen/woodcut rule, showing intaglio prints with very fine linework. But he also had two issues of a comic book called The Astronomer for sale. This comic was funded by an outrageously successful Kickstarter campaign (he asked for $4000 and got over $11,000). The comic combines various myths and legends into one grungy epic of cosmic Aztec/Norse Yetis. It reflects another aspect of this subculture--comics (specifically alternative comics).


The Astronomer issue 1 by Matt Rebholz


Courtney Woodliff and her art

Another artist whose work I liked a lot was Coutney Woodliff. It also had an alternative comics vibe, reminding me stylistically of Krystine Kryttre, Jeff/Jess Johnson, Julie Doucet and Michael Dougan. In other words, it has a kind of 80s/90s feel to me. She was selling prints pretty cheap, so I bought one.



This violent image is like a collision with Johnny Cash, Courtney Love and Ed Gein. And that kind of defines the esthetic on display at this show. This was a kind of art that thrilled me when I was younger. Nowadays I get a little tired of the adolescent sensibility of a lot of this art (skulls! chicks! rock music!), but frankly I sometimes need the energy it gives me, especially after a season of somewhat enervating art by people like Liz Magic Laser and Tony Feher.


Sean Starwars' table

This was Sean Starwars table, and unlike many of the artists present, Sean Starwars didn't use his prints to show off his bravura drawing skills or brilliant design--they seem deliberately primitive and consequently rather refreshing. Sometimes stupid has a vitality all its own.



Nonetheless, the average artist here showed a high degree of craft. I wasn't surprised to see this Tshirt on the Infinity Prints table--master printers like Durer are held in high regard by these modern descendents.


Cannonball Press

This giant print from Cannonball Press suggests another influence--carnival and circus posters. The influences on the art here were schizoid--one one hand, renaissance artists like Durer and Hans Holbein are revered; at the same time, abject art like carnival signs and tattoo art are big influences. This speaks to the collapsing of hierarchies that was supposed to have happened with the end of modernism. But from where I sit, those hierarchies still hold sway for the most part--no less than 19th century French artists, we have our academies which offers artists official credentials (an MFA) and collectively look somewhat askance at the kind of artists shown at "It Came From the Bayou." But I don't want to portray this as some kind of great injustice. For one thing, the wall between these art worlds is porous--look at the rise of graffiti art in the estimation of the art world. And second, the printmakers at "It Came From the Bayou" and artists like them have made their own thing. They don't really need validation from Artforum.

There was a third event on Sunday at St. Arnold's brewery, but I didn't attend it. I had seen enough prints that weekend. But this is just the start of the annual print invasion here. PrintHouston has lots of shows and events lined up this summer. I suspect they will mostly printmaking of the polite, genteel school as opposed to the kind Courtney Woodliff and Tom Huck do. But it is nice that PrintHouston started off its season with this big barbaric yawp. I thoroughly enjoyed it.

Share

Picasso’s 1911 Accordionist: Some Related Thoughts

$
0
0
Virginia Billeaud Anderson

In July of 1911, Picasso went to the French Pyrenees town of Céret, and there waited somewhat impatiently for Braque to arrive so they could continue annihilating traditional notions of artistic representation. We can thank noted art historians - Roland Penrose, Douglas Cooper, John Golding - for amalgamating anecdotal material on Picasso and Braque’s cubist collaboration. Braque said he and Picasso were “mountaineers roped together,” and Picasso called Braque “his wife.” Picasso’s assertion that for a while their work was so similar they were unable to distinguish by whom it was made is rhetorically enshrined. It was John Richardson who mined correspondence to offer the enlightening commentary that in Céret Picasso acquired a monkey whose testicles he admired. The animal had “two noble balls,” Picasso told Apollinaire in a letter.

For many, Picasso’s 1907 Les Demoiselles marks the beginning of cubism, although I make the case for his 1906 Portrait of Gertrude Stein, but it requires a close look at the interlocking planes and angularity in that rotund figure’s facial features to accept this as plausible. What is irrefutable is that the paintings Picasso and Braque created while working in Céret, Picasso’s 1911 Accordionist and 1911 Landscape at Céret, and Braque’s 1911-12 Le Portugaise and 1911 Rooftops, Céret, represent cubism at its most perfect moment. Their innovative practice was to disassemble pictorial form by means of fragmentation, faceting, planarity, angularity, atonal coloring, and unexpected translucence, the result being masterpieces of analytic cubism that revolutionized art. Picasso’s seminal Accordionist is included in the Museum of Fine Arts, Houston’s Picasso Black and White exhibition, and is the inspiration for this essay.


Pablo Picasso, Accordionist, Céret, summer 1911, oil on canvas, Solomon R. Guggenheim Museum, New York, Solomon R. Guggenheim Founding Collection, by gift. © 2013 Estate of Pablo Picasso / Artists Rights Society (ARS), New York

In his multi-volume biography, John Richardson cites Golding on Picasso and Braque’s accomplishments at Céret:
nothing would excel the feat they brought off at Céret, when the two of them pooled their prodigious resources - their very different skills and powers of invention and imagination. As Golding says, it was “a moment of poise and equilibrium.”
Like Richardson, David Sylvester had profound appreciation for the work completed by the two artists at Céret and assigned “unassailable authority” to the early cubist paintings, but not without making a catty remark about Richardson. Sylvester said Richardson understood the extent to which the artists inspired each other, but insufficiently grasped their mysterious intellectual bond. In the process of subverting six centuries of European painting, Sylvester wrote, Picasso and Braque “achieved a perfect combination of intellectual curiosity and instinctive response as they worked away as if under a spell.” “The mystery isn’t quite evoked by Richardson,” he continued, “but perhaps it is impossible for a book to be both a thorough biography and an altogether satisfying critical study.” Did Sylvester hiss at Richardson because Richardson is a better writer?

Let me recommend art historian Robert Rosenblum’s writings on early cubism. He offers a fine encapsulation of the era’s stylistic developments, and is particularly helpful with the distinctions between analytic and synthetic cubism. Rosenblum’s is an intellectually elevated, multi-disciplined approach to early cubism, as illustrated below.
In so creating a many-leveled world of dismemberment and discontinuity, Picasso and Braque are paralleled in the other arts. For example, their almost exact contemporary, Igor Stravinsky, demonstrates a new approach to musical structure that might well be called “Cubist.” Often his melodic line-– especially in “Le Sacre du printemps” (1912 13) - is splintered into fragmentary motifs by rhythmic patterns as jagged and shifting as the angular planes of Cubist painting and equally destructive of a traditional sense of fluid sequence. Similarly, Stravinsky’s experiments in polytonality, as in “Petrouchka” (1911), where two different tonalities (C and F# major in the most often cited example) are sounded simultaneously, provide close analogies to the multiple images of Cubism, which destroy the possibility of an absolute reading of the work of art. In literature as well, James Joyce and Virginia Woolf (both born within a year of Picasso and Braque) were to introduce “Cubist” techniques in novels like “Ulysses” (composed between 1914 and 1921) and “Mrs. Dalloway” (1925). In both these works the narrative sequence is limited in time to the events of one day; and, as in a Cubist painting, these events are recomposed in a complexity of multiple experiences and interpretations that evoke the simultaneous and contradictory fabric of reality itself. [Robert Rosenblum, Cubism and 20th Century Art]
Art historian Jack Flam would agree with Rosenblum that cubism’s fragmentation, ambiguity and indeterminacy evoke the nature of reality. In his opinion the cubists were aiming for “truth” underlying visual experience. Flam spoke of Braque’s “conscious mysticism.”

Let’s end with Joyce. In his book of annotations and essays written to help readers understand Joyce’s complex allusions, Stuart Gilbert points out another example of Joyce’s cubistic fragmentation. Speaking through his character Stephen Dedalus in “A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man,” Joyce shares his aesthetic vision: “What I call the rhythm of beauty is the first formal aesthetic relation of part to part in any aesthetic whole or of an aesthetic whole to its part or parts or of any part to the aesthetic whole of which it is a part.” How interesting that Gertrude Stein, whose sandals Apollinaire called “Delphic,” said in her biography that Picasso named Braque and James Joyce as “the two incomprehensibles.”

Picasso Black and White, which includes Accordionist, is open through Sunday, May 27, at the MFAH.


Share

Even More Art From Frieze (some NSFW)

$
0
0
Robert Boyd


Adriana Lara, Os verdadeiros artistas estão nas ruas, 2012, inkjet on canvas, 20 x 40 cm at Air de Paris

Os verdadeiros artistas estão nas ruas. "The real artists are in the streets." In other words, what the hell are you dong here at Frieze? Well, despite the fashionable people and luxurious surroundings, there was a lot of art to see. I've written about some of it. Here's some more, mostly presented without comment.


Eddie Peake at Lorcan O'Neill

Not sure what this one is called, but I imagined buying it to hang in the lobby of The Great God Pan Is Dead Enterprises.


Eddie Peake, Tangling in Hair, 2013, two black and whire posters and three oil on wood paintings, 42 x 95 x 1 inch at White Cube

Eddie Peake had strikingly different work at different galleries.


Agnieszka Kurant, Archive of Phantom Islands, 2011, pigment print on archival paper, polyptych of 30, 36.5 x 28 cm at Galeria Fortes Vilaça


Agnieszka Kurant, Archive of Phantom Islands (detail), 2011, pigment print on archival paper, polyptych of 30, 36.5 x 28 cm at Galeria Fortes Vilaça

Agnieszka Kurant's Archive of Phantom Islands is the kind of art that appeals to nerdy fans of Ian Hamilton Finlay and Jorge Luis Borges (like me).


Alex Schweder at Jack Hanley


Alice Channer, various pieces, 2013, cast, pigmented polyurethane resin at The Approach


Alicja Kwade, heavy weight of light, 2012, wood, bronze, copper, brass, stailess steel, mirror, MDF, approximately 118 x 240 x 80 inches


Carsten Höller at Massimo de Carlo


Cornelia Parker, Endless Sugar, 2011, 30 pieces of silver plate flattenned by a 250 ton industria; press, 165.4 x 9.8 inches


David Shrigley at Anton Kern


Djordje Ozbolt, Les Objects Mystique Plastique, 2013, dyed polyester resin, 85 x 50.3 7.8 inches at Herald St.


Elmgreen & Dragset, I Will Never See You Again, 2009, mixed media

I Will Never See You Again by Elmgreen and Dragset: art for ex-lovers. My friend DC is caught in the reflection.


Ernesto Neto, Splasmiopylea, 2003, polyamide textile, stryofoam beads, wooden pegs, 120 x 217 x 3 inches at Tanya Bonaker Gallery

One of my favorites.


Gimhongsok, Material, 2012, cast resin at Kukje Gallery


Joseph Grigely, That's What We Live For, 2007, crystal urethane, 36 1/2x 32 x 33


Jenny Holzer, Heap, 2012, array of 7 LED signs with stainless steel housing: 3 with blue & red diodes on front, amber and blue diodes on back, 104.8 x 95 x 95 inches


Jenny Scobel, Mr. Wilson's Wife, 2013, oil, pencil, watercolor on vellum, 121.9 x 81.3 cm, at Zeno X Gallery


Jenny Scobel, untitled, 2013, mixed media on vellum, 109.5 x 83 cm, at Zeno X Gallery

These two portraits by Jenny Scobel are powerfully sexy; there is something strange and attractive about the nearly identical deadpan expressions on her face.


Jeremy Diller, A Range Rover crushed and made into a bench, 2012, Silkscreen print on paper, dimensions variable


Jon Pestoni, Hostages, 2013, oil on canvas, 103 x 78 x 2 inches at David Kordansky Gallery


KAWS, NTY, 2012, acrylic on canvas, 60 inch diameter


Kendell Geers, Bladerunner XIV, 2012, mild steel and razormesh, 120 x 51 x 51 cm

"Oh look, dear. This Kendell Geers would be perfect for the nursery!"


Liam Gillick, ...And Upheaval, 2012, powder coated aluminum, 74.8 x 98.4 x3.9 inches


Lily Van Der Stokker at Susanne Vielmetter Los Angeles Projects


Lynda Benglis, Eat Meat, 1969/75, aluminum, 24 x 80 x 50 inches at Cheim & Read

The fact that I accidentally juxtaposed those two very shapely legs with Lynda Benglis's sculpture Eat Meat has absolutely no psychological subtext, so get that thought out of your dirty mind.


Mathieu Mercir, untitled, 2012, acrylic on canvas, 55 inches diameter at Mehdi Chouakri


Matthieu Mercier, untitled, 2011-2012, steel structure, 2 cylinders of carpet, 77 x 200 x 77 cm at Mehdi Chouakri


Matthew Day Jackson, Domestic Space (in Space), 2013, burned wood, formica, mirror plexiglass on panel, stainless steel frame, 97.5 x 97.5 inches at Hauser & Wirth


Naama Tsabar at Dvir Gallery


Naama Tsabar (detail) at Dvir Gallery



Nick Cave, Soundsuit,  2011, mixed media including fabric, vintage toys, seesaw and mannequin, 144 x 166 x 45 inches


Nina Canell, Salt Sings, 2013, steel pipes, cable, marble, neon, 3000V, salt, water at Mother's Tankstation


Paul McCarthy, White Snow at Hauser & Wirth


Paul McCarthy, White Snow at Hauser & Wirth


Paul McCarthy, Balloon Dog, 2013, sealed PVC plastic, fan at Hauser & Wirth


Penny Slinger, Bride in the Bath-Film, 1969, 16 mm transfer to DVD, b&w and color; Bride in the Bath II, 1969/2013, life-cast based assemblage sculpture, fiberglass, silk, resin and bathtub at Air de Paris


Raymond Pettibon at Meyer Kainer


Rodney Graham, Sunday Sun, 1937, 2012, transparency in lightbox, 34.6 x 34.6 x 7 inches at Lisson Gallery


Rodney Graham, Sunday Sun (detail), 1937, 2012, transparency in lightbox, 34.6 x 34.6 x 7 inches

For a fan of old comic strips like me, Rodney Graham's Sunday Sun was a wonderful photo.


Roman Signer, Stühle mit Raketen, wooden chairs, copper, fireworks at Galerie Martin Janda


Ryan McGinley, India (Frost), 2013, c-print, 72 x 108 inches at Team Gallery


Sam Falls at T293


Sam Falls at T293

I love these colorful geometric sculptures by Sam Falls, but what really makes them great are the painted angle braces.


Sarnath Banerjee, Temporary Autonomous Zones (from a set of 9), ink and brush on paper, 11 x 6.5 inches at Project 88


Sarnath Banerjee, Temporary Autonomous Zones (from a set of 9), ink and brush on paper, 11 x 6.5 inches at Project 88


Sarnath Banerjee, Temporary Autonomous Zones (from a set of 9), ink and brush on paper, 11 x 6.5 inches at Project 88


Sean Landers at International Art Objects Galleries


Vik Muniz, The Stone Breakers, after Gustave Courbet (Pictures of Magazines 2), 2013, digital c-print at Sikkema Jenkins


Sue Williams, Deflate, 2013, oil and acrylic on canvas, 74 x 134 inches at 303 Gallery

I think Sue Williams'sDeflate was my favorite piece in the whole show.


Share

An Open Letter to Homeowners in the Memorial Villages

$
0
0
Robert Boyd


Meredith jack sculpture in from of the Art Museum of Southeast Texas (AMSET)


at AMSET


In Meredith Jack's studio

Dear Memorial Villages homeowners,

Your big beautiful front yards would be immeasurably improved with the addition of a piece of sculpture by Meredith Jack.

love,
The Great God Pan Is Dead


at AMSET


At AMSET


In Meredith Jack's studio


In Meredith Jack's studio


At AMSET


In Meredith Jack's studio


In Meredith Jack's studio


Share

Brandon Araujo at Domy

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

In the Fall, Cody Ledvina will be opening a new art space in the current Domy space called Brandon. So it was a little confusing to see this sign in Brasil (the restaurant connected to Domy).



And it was funny that Ledvina's name was so much more prominent than Brandon Araujo's. But this exhibit may give us an idea of how Ledvina will use Domy's space. One one hand, you have the deliberate hilarious amateurism of the painted sign. On the other hand, you have this big sign in the restaurant where hundreds of people will see it. They'll laugh at the misspelling, but will be intrigued by it. Maybe they'll be too busy eating to go next door to Domy right away. That's OK--Ledvina has that covered, too.


Installation of Brandon Araujo paintings on the wall of Brasil


Brandon Araujo, untitled, 2013, acrylic and spray paint, 16 x 20 inches

There are three different kinds of paintings in this exhibit: chrome paintings (like the one above), blue paintings and Kapton paintings. Kapton is a high-tech polyimide film. (No, I have no idea what "polyimide" is.) Anyway, this film and tape seems to have a bunch of high-tech uses, and as far as I know, it is not a commonly used art material. The wing-shaped painting above is one of the Kapton paintings.


Brandon Araujo, untitled, 2013, spray paint, plaster and Kapton on canvas, 11 x 14 inches

You can see the Kapton tape at the top and bottom of untitled above. But for me, what was more interesting about these small paintings was the effect of the spray paint on the highly textured plaster. Because the spray paint hits it an an angle, it makes the relief seem deeper than it is. It's a very interesting visual effect.



For the three small Kapton paintings, Ledvina painted a trompe l'oeil brick shelf for them to rest on.


Brandon Araujo, untitled, acrylic on canvas, 16 x 20 inches

Araujo does something similar with the acrylic blue paintings as he does with the plaster and spray-paint on the Kapton paintings. I can't quite dissect the technique he's using, but it looks as if he lays down some thick acrylic, then after allowing it to dry, he goes back in and glazes it blue. This creates a strong relief effect which I find quite beautiful.


Brandon Araujo, untitled, acrylic on canvas, 16 x 20 inches


Brandon Araujo, untitled, acrylic on canvas, 36 x 48 inches

I can't find much about Brandon Araujo online. I know he's been in a fewgroup shows locally and that he has a BFA from the University of Houston. But his biographical info is mostly irrelevant to the matter at hand, which is that this is a fine show. And it benefits from high quality curating (including the silly-ass sign).


Share


Big Five Oh, part 3: Ellen Carey at JHB Gallery

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

LM, DC, Ford and I agreed to meet the day after Frieze in Greenwich Village. DC wanted us to see some photographs by Ellen Carey. We went over to JHB Gallery to check out this work. JHB Gallery has been around since 1982--the history of the gallery on its website describes it beginning in Midtwon in 82, moving to Tribeca in 84, to Soho in 88 and finally closing the storefront in 95 and working as a private dealer. I suppose after you have built up a network of collectors, at some point the expense of having a storefront is not justifiable. But how do you get new clients? In this case, DC purchased a Carey photograph from a charity auction. I've often wondered if there was something a bit exploitative about charity auctions--I mean, what's in it for the artist, except for good feelings? Well, in Ellen Carey's case, she may have acquired a couple of new collectors. In any case, Baum must be doing something right--she represents 36 artists.

Now JHB Gallery is in Jayne Baum's apartment. Like most New York apartments, it is small and uses space efficiently. Two art drawers formed the base for a table with wings that, once opened, became the surface that she showed us Carey's photos.


left to right, foreground--Ford, DC, LM; background--Jayne Baum's husband (I think), Jayne Baum

Jayne Baum and her assistant (who I think is also her husband) patiently showed us hundreds of Carey's photos. DC was keen to expand his collection, and once he saw them in the flesh, LM was enthusiastic. Carey, a professor at Hartford Art School, specializes in photos made without the use of a camera. In the Dings and Shadows series, she crumples up photo paper and exposes it from various angles to colored light. The effect is of looking at a deep, intensely colored relief, abstract but with a real sense of space.


Ellen Carey, Untitled, 2011, unique c-print from the series Dings and Shadows, c-print, 24 x 20 inches

But seeing them in a reproduction doesn't really give you the true effect. The paper, although it has been flattened, still retains the creases and shallow folds it have from being crumpled up in the first place. So you have the physical deformation of the paper which is extremely exaggerated by the play of color and shadow. They aren't just images--they are beautiful, intriguing objects.


Ellen Carey, Untitled, 2011, unique c-print from the series Dings and Shadows, c-print, 24 x 20 inches

As we looked, we discussed each work, talking about the technique, the colors, the design, and so forth. LM and DC would occasionally ask that one be set aside to look at later. We were in that warm apartment for two hours, and they spent that whole time in deep contemplation. The amount of concentration spent on each piece was remarkable.


DC and LM concentrating hard

And they didn't buy anything on the spot. But I suspect they will. Baum will send them jpegs of the ones they set aside, and they'll roll it over some more, and then make a decision.

Up to now, they had no common artists in their respective collections. But I think Ellen Carey may be their first.

Share

Big Frame Up in Austin

$
0
0
Robert Boyd


This giant blue genie had nothing to do with Frame besides being across the parking lot from Big Medium

East Austin has become a locus for Austin's art scene.  Of course there is EAST, the East Austin studio tour, but studios are the loam out of which other things grow--galleries, artists spaces, etc. Frame to me seemed to be about promoting the next stage of the evolution of an art district. Some institutions have sprung up, and to help people realize this, they join their voices like the citizens of Whoville, shouting "We are here!" The four participants were Tiny Park, MASS, Big Medium and Co-Lab. What's interesting is that this grouping includes a commercial gallery, a non-profit and a couple of artist-run spaces.

Big Medium is a nonprofit that organizes EAST and the Texas Biennial. Soon they will have their own storefront space in a new development called Canopy. Right now, Canopy is empty. I think they'd like to full of galleries and complimentary businesses. Big Medium arranged for two of the spaces to be used on a temporary basis. So on the day of Frame, Fahamu Pecou: All Dat Glitters Ain’t Goals (curated by Salvador Castillo) was having its closing night and The F.R. Etchen Collection; Selected Works and More was opening.


Fahamu Pecou at Big Medium

Fahamu Pecou is an Atlanta-based artist who uses self-portraiture, video and performance to reflect on images and stereotypes of black manhood in the era of hiphop. The big canvases were impressive and projected an ironic sense of overblown masculinity, but the videos were the star of the show. They came across as modest and homespun (although they included some clever effects), with forceful but ironic raps.



The other Big Medium show was a show of Russell Etchen's personal art collection. Obviously this is a curatorial idea I have no real objection to. In Etchen's case, a lot of his collection comes from his colleagues in Sketch Klubb, various folks on the Houston art scene who are about his age, bits of comics-related artwork, and other odds and ends. Etchen is a cash-poor collector, which makes his collection all the more interesting--each piece has a story and is not simply the result of a cash exchange.


Mark Flood, Blue Skies for Russell Etchen

For example, Etchen has an astonishing collection of Mark Flood paintings because he designs Flood's publications and is more-or-less a member of the Flood entourage.


Mark Flood, Kitchen Mirror


Clockwise from the top: Jonny Negron drawing; 2 Geoff Hippensteil paintings; Travis Kent, Fan



Johnny Ryan

I loved Johnny Ryan's tribute to D.J. Screw.


Tim Kerr, Coltrane

John Porcellino, Skunk Cabbage

My next stop was MASS Gallery, a co-op operation that includes studios and a giant exhibition space. They were opening with a group show called Wally, which was apparently about the relationship of art to the wall. Unless you are radically examining this concept as William Anastasi did with Six Sites, it seems like a trivial theme for a show. The ways that the work addressed "walls" were not particularly profound. But it was a group show, and the thing about group shows is that one can usually find a few things to like.


Leah Bailis, Cinderblocks, 2013, cardboard and paint

Something like Cinderblocks by Leah Bailis strikes me as painfully obvious in terms of "walls," but quite appealing in terms of being a piece of sculpture. Because of their cardboard structure, they have the feeling of cartoon cinderblocks--the kind that Popeye could bust through easily.


Lee Piechocki, I Have a Lot of Faith in This Model, 2013, plexiglass, wood, sculpy, paint, paper, vinyl, found objects on shelf

As someone whose job revolves around making computer models of real things, I liked I Have a Lot of Faith in This Model by Lee Piechocki. The models I make are generally opaque to the people I make them for, and a lot of what I do is convince them that I believe in the model and that they should as well. This mysterious grouping of objects is also asking us to take it on faith that it works. And I do.


Yashua Klos, Totem, 2011, woodblock prints collaged onto archival paper

And I thought Yashua Klos's Totem was simply beautiful.


Kansas City Plein Air Coterie (KC PAC) Open Session 

After checking out the show, I went out into the vast concrete "courtyard" where several people were set up painting. This was an activity open to all but led by the Kansas City Plein Air Coterie (KC PAC) with artist Lee Piechocki.

Then off to Co-Lab, which was having an exhibit and performance by Brooke Gassiot called The Stories Our Neurons Tell. It consisted of several sculptural objects, some incorporating video elements.

 
piece by Brooke Gassiot.

This one, whose title I didn't catch, was quite powerful. At first, you saw a large circular structure supporting a curtain that was about 7 or 8 feet high. You had to walk into the corner of the gallery space behind the structure to find a gap in the curtain. When you did, you saw the bathtub with a video projection in it above. I couldn't tell if the woman in the tub was crying or exhausted, but it's a strong image. And the way it provides a glow within the otherwise dimply-lit scene made it stronger. A projected image like this is a ghostly image--I didn't feel like it was meant to portray something existing now but rather the memory of something, possibly something very bad. Something that makes a woman cry in her bathtub.


scar piece by Brooke Gassiot

And memory is continued in this piece. You can't really see them in this photo, but the lightbox there is covered with little drawings. Gassiot was drawing these in the next room. People would sit down and show Gassiot a scar, which she would draw. As she drew, her subject told the story of that scar to her. Mine was a scar on my right palm, acquired in the late 80s on a boat in the Gulf of Mexico, stitched up in an emergency room in Houma, Louisiana. Then using needle and thread, she sewed up the drawing of your scar with the same number of stitches you actually got. Then you took the drawing and added it to the pile. It was a very personal experience between you and the artist. (And the artist got to hear a bunch of great stories, so she got something out of it as well.)

My favorite show was at Tiny Park, my last stop on my Frame Tour.  It was a show by Joel Ross and Jason Creps. Their work consists mainly of signs that they have made and left someplace. This is Ross's part of the process. The residue of the work are photos of the signs in situ (taken by Creps, who is also a commercial photographer. He did the cover photo for Neko Case's album Middle Cyclone.)


Joel Ross and Jacob Creps, IN THE FUTURE (Installed and abandoned, Bradley, IL), 2012, archival pigment print, 42 x 55 inches

In addition to the photographs, the show consists of signs and word pieces. Their power is somewhat diminished being in a gallery setting (instead of just being out in public), but Ross makes up for that by being so amusing and clever.


Joel Ross, #UC!&+%, 2012, vinyl and acrylic paint on pine, dimensions variable


Joel Ross, #UC!&+%, 2012, vinyl and acrylic paint on pine, dimensions variable


 Joel Ross, It Was a Bad Idea, 2010, flashe and graphite on paper, 60 x 30 inches

Still, the problem with these in the gallery setting is that they seem like clever one-liners of a sort. It's only out in the world that these things gain power. So Ross did an installation. He did it at the studio of OK Mountain over on Cesar Chavez, so he wasn't strictly removing it from an institutional setting. Nonetheless, it must have given people whiplash as they drove by it at night.


Joel Ross, TORTURE SOUNDS INCREDIBLE, 2006, electronic LED sign, 57 x 84 x 7 inches

All in all, I thought Frame was a success. But it would be even better if there were a bunch of galleries at Canopy. Frame is trying to force a beneficial clustering effect, and that may work, but it needs to get bigger and more dense in the long run.

Share

Self-Portraiture through Social Media with a Side of Crystal Meth

$
0
0
Dean Liscum

As a self-proclaimed art critic and reviewer, I was curious about/envious of/doubtful that Devon Britt-Darby's exhibition, Art Criticism and Reporting, could command my (or anyone else's) attention or interest for longer than it took me to inhale my drink. I went out of morbid curiosity because as a writer I know that art writing is many things: analysis, critical thinking, emotional insecurity, pettiness, and personal preference professed, but art it is not. I doubted that Britt-Darby's work could hold its own against Adela Andea's sculptures (think Donald Judd on acid)


Adela Andea's work in the Art League courtyard

or the mixed media complexity of Giovanni Valderas but I was willing to listen to his talk and check it out the work.

The talk wandered through the maze that has become the Art Guys Marry a Plant and Britt-Darby's response, a social sculpture/performance piece, The Art Gay Marries a Woman, and the antics that have followed. (It's all on his blog...at least the interesting parts.) The topic was germane, but  the presentation was more Jermaine Jackson in that you had a vague sense of why you were there but the show wasn't delivering what you wanted. For instance, I learned that according to Devon (Douglas Britt's nom de sex) being a sex worker in San Francisco is relatively easy and lucrative. Lots of artists moonlight as sex workers (according to one artist/ex-sex worker). Also, sex work is a cash business that makes crystal meth addiction that much easier.  Go figure.

However, the talk did eventually meander toward art and set the stage for the source of the works in the exhibit, the portraits. The works are monochromatic, text-based works composed of grey acrylic paint and glass particles on canvas. The legibility of the works shifts with the changes in the ambient light in the gallery.


Devon Britt-Darby, Doug69, HooBoy’s Male4Male Escort Review, 2013, Acrylic, glass microspheres and enamel on canvas

Britt-Darby cites Glenn Ligon'scoal dust paintings, which play with legibility and text, as one of his influences.


Devon Britt-Darby, Peter Simek, Salon, 2013, Acrylic, glass microspheres and enamel on canvas

Britt-Darby added another visibility challenge to his canvases by borrowing a technique from the Los Angeles based artist Mary Corse. Corse uses glass microspheres, which are used to make painted lines on roads reflective.

The text consists of quotes taken from social media sites. Some of the media reviews art. Some of it reviews escorts/sex workers. All of it reviews Devon Britt-Darby. Britt-Darby deems these works on canvas as portraits of the people who wrote the art criticism and reporting. In his creation myth, he is the Rorschach test by which these reviewers reveal themselves. As he states of the works and himself in the third person, "[these texts] aren't by him, they are directed at him." As an artist selecting which textual passages to paint, he views himself as in control of his subject. He is the portrait artist with himself as a common, defining theme for his subjects.

The conceit becomes (as he presents it) portraits of the authors as seen through the lens of his sex worker-crystal meth addiction-plant marrying protest antics. And I reject that conceit. His assertion seems a little disingenuous to me. It's both silly and safe for Britt-Darby to position these works as portraits because the focus becomes these reviewers and the culture/audience that they represent. But it's not. Anyone who heard the talk or views the show will immediately understand that it's all about Britt-Darby. Not that there's anything wrong with that. Because there isn't. These portraits are unique and intriguing exactly because their medium is the words and perceptions of others about the artist.


Devon Britt-Darby, Robert Boyd, The Great God Pan Is Dead, 2013, Acrylic, glass microspheres and enamel on canvas

It is in this selection process that Britt-Darby portrays himself, that he self-actualizes for all the world to see. Not as a sex worker or meth addict or a gay-rights activist or a self-absorbed columnist, but as an artist. It is in these supposed "portraits" of his critics and reviewers that he creates his own revealing self-portraits.

The supposition of the show begs the question--if what a person (artist/critic/audience member) says about a subject (controversial or not) portrays who s/he is, then DOES NOT the criticism of someone that the criticized chooses to repeat/re-present to an audience through verbal or visual art self-portray (or betray) that person?

I say it does, and I'm not sure what that says about me. But I'm thegreatgodpanisdead, and I'm OK with that.

Share

The TRUTH About Art Dealers

$
0
0
"People don't appreciate the creativity of dealing art. In the contemporary market, it is the dealer--not the artist--who does most of the work. Without us, there would be no Modernism, no Minimalism, no movements at all. All the contemporary legends would be painting houses or teaching adult education classes. Museum collections would grind to a halt after the Renaissance; sculptors would still be carving pagan gods; video would be the province of pornography; graffiti a petty crime rather than the premise behind a multimillion-dollar industry. Art, in short, would cease to thrive. And this is because--in a post-Church, post-patronage era--dealers refine and pipeline the fuel that drives art's engine, that has always driven it and always will: money.

"These days especially, there is simply too much material out there for any normal person to distinguish between good and bad. That's the dealer's job. We are creators, too--only we create markets, and our medium is the artists themselves. Markets, in turn, create movements, and movements create tastes, culture, the canon of acceptability--in short, what we think of as art itself. A piece of art becomes a piece of art--and an artist becomes an artist--when I make you take out your checkbook."

from The Genius by Jesse Kellerman, 2008

Share

Big Five Oh, part 4: Pulse

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

After Ford, LM, DC and I left JHB Gallery, Ford decided he was ready to check out some non-visual art aspects of New York. He wanted to hit the big comic stores and record stores and musical instrument stores and cool bars in Brooklyn and so forth. He had a list which DC, who has lived in NYC for decades, was able to add to and annotate for him.  Ford went off on his own adventure while LM, DC and I went to Pulse.

Last year, Pulse struck me as the cheesiest, most pandering of the three art fairs I went to New York. It retains its position this year, but the thing about art fairs is that the content can vary so much from gallery to gallery and even within a single gallery. There is an economic imperative that pushes work in a certain direction.
  1. Galleries pay a lot of money to be at Pulse
  2. Therefore, they necessarily must bring their work that is most likely to sell
  3. Which may include work with a high T 'n' A quotient
  4. Or work that makes viewers say things like "Boy, that's clever!" or "That's look great in the living room!"


Jordan Doner, Auto Dali II, 2006, C-Print, printed 2013 at Steven Kasher Gallery

Steven Kasher Gallery was a somewhat schizo gallery in that regard. You had high pander-rate photos like Auto Dali II (which recreates the famous 1951 Dali photo In Voluptas Mors but with modern sleek skinny models). But then you had super-charming photos like Untitled (Boy with Pipe at Shoreline) by Vivian Maier.


Vivian Maier, Untitled (Boy with Pipe at Shoreline), ca. 1960s, gelatin silver, printed 2012, 20 x 16 inches

You had this split-beaver collage by Ashkan Honarvar.


Ashkan Honarvar, Creed, The Apple 1, 2013, collage, 10.6 x 26.8 inches

But you also had these classic subway graffiti photos by Henry Chalfant. (I had and treasured copies of his books Subway Art and Spraycan Art in the 80s, which encouraged me to do my own large scale graffiti pieces in 1988.)


Henry Chalfant, top to bottom: Untitled (Soup Cans), ca. 1980; Crash Dealt, 1980; Revolt Min, 1979; Blades, 1979, printed 2011, Kodak Professional Endura metallic paper, 11 x 42 inches each

And some naked Kate Moss courtesy of Chuck Close is an easy 65 grand for Adamson Gallery. (Actually, I have no idea if this is true. Even for Kate, that's a lot of money.)


Chuck Close, Untitled (Kate), 2008, archival pigment print on Innova-F gloss paper, Chine-colléd to Fabriano watercolor paper, 60 x 40 inches

Then there was art that was cutesy and "clever", like the pieces by Jorge Perianes at PanAmerican Art Projects.


Jorge Perianes, Untitled, 2008, mixed media, 36 x 40 inches

But the work I hated most of all can at least say it wasn't trying to pander to anyone's baser tastes.


Kim Rugg, Are You Sitting Comfortably, 2012, hand-woven needlepoint on found object and carved wood chair, 32 x 23 x 21 inches at Davidson Contemporary

Kim Rugg's Are You Sitting Comfortably was so smug and self-righteous that I really did want to sit comfortably on it and maybe even take a nap.

But all in all, this year's Pulse didn't seem quite as crass as last year's Pulse. I saw plenty of art I liked such as this beautiful abstract photo by Amanda Means.


Amanda Means, Grid Abstraction #39, 2005, developer on Ilford matte gelatin silver fiber paper, 24 x 20 inches at Von Lintel Gallery


Aylin Langreuter at Galerie Wittenbrink

Aylin Langreuter had several "cars in the jungle" pieces, of which this was the best one.


Dawn Black, Conceal Project (24 Panels), 2013, Watercolor and gouache on paper, 5 1/2 x 7 1/2 each

\
Dawn Black, one of the panels in Conceal Project (24 Panels), 2013, Watercolor and gouache on paper, 5 1/2 x 7 1/2 each

I loved these weird little portraits by Dawn Black at Cynthia Reeves.


Jeffrey Gibson, Dances Hard for Who We Were, 2013 Wool US Army blankets, artist's own repurposed painting, glass beads, steel, artificial sinew, acrylic paint 60 x 16 x 16 inches

 Dances Hard for Who We Were by Jeffrey Gibson is a piece I'd be proud to hang in my gym.


Liset Castillo, Shopping Bag, 2011, Sand, cable, fabric, resin water, Matte Super Heavy Gel Medium and Plexiglass Box at Habana

Shopping Bag by Liset Castillo belongs in that category of art I noticed at Frieze: sculptures of modest containers.

And then there were pieces that made me laugh, and I value that highly.


Yoan Capote, Juntos, 2006, metal, wood, fabric at Habana

Juntos by Yoan Capote prompted DC, LM and I to speculate on the practical design of an umbrella for couples.


Michael Scoggins, Conan the Barbarian, 2008, marker,prismacolor on paper, 67 x 51 inches at Freight + Volume

Michael Scoggins' tribute to junior high notebook art is even funnier in person given that it is over five feet tall.


Adam Parker Smith, Untitled (Poster), 2013, acrylic on paper, 30 x 20 inches at Davidson Contemporary

It's hilarious that Davidson Contemporary felt it necessary to include a hand-written note reading "PLEASE DO NOT TOUCH!!!" on the wall label for Adam Parker Smith's piece. I guess people tried to rip the phone numbers off.

Book Art

If there was a trend at Pulse, it was art made our of books.


LongBin Chen, Bach, from Composer Series, 2013 at the West Collection


LongBin Chen, Bach, from Composer Series, 2013 at the West Collection


Jessica Drenk, Bibliophylum, books, wax, pins at Adeh Rose

Jessica Drenk somehow took books and carved them into these little feather-like objects.


Rune Guneriussen, Discipline Comsidered an Option, C-Print, 45 x 69 inches at Galerie Olivier Waltman

Pulse Projects

Every art fair brings in sculptures and performances as part of the experience. Pulse describes Pulse Projects as "the presentation and promotion of audience- engaging large-scale sculptures, installations and performances." I commend Pulse for this because I generally prefer this kind of work to audience-repelling sculptures, installations and performances.


Russell Maltz, Painted/Stacked, ongoing, Day-Glo enamel on concrete block with wood palette and banding iron; dimensions variable


Tristin Lowe, Comet: Nature, 2011, neon, glass, transformers, aluminum, steel; 101 x 29 inches

Duck!

Coagula

One of the inspirations for The Great God Pan Is Dead was Coagula. Coagula played with being a gossip tabloid in format, but what appealed to me is that in doing so, it went below the surface of the art world to display the machinations and personalities that animated it. It assumed that art could not be somehow isolated from the world in which it exists. After a few naive years of pollyanna idealism, this has become my belief, too. That's why this blog is so interested in such things as the mechanics of art fairs, for example.

Anyway, Coagula now puts its money where its mouth is with its own gallery space, Coagula Curatorial. They had one of the most interesting booths at Pulse. As for the magazine, it still exists on-line and you can read editor/publisher Mat Gleason's pieces regularly on HuffPost.



Mat Gleason (with the shocking red hair) at the Coagula booth


David Horii, Boys' Life (Henry), 2011, acrylic on canvas, 18 x 18 inches at Coagula


panties by Leigh Salgado at Coagula


Tim Youd, Typing Tropic, 2013, ongoing performance

Coagula had a performance in their booth, which set them apart from every other exhibitor as far as I could tell. Tim Youd was typing a copy of Tropic of Capricorn by Henry Miller on two pieces of paper run through the typewriter over and over again. The top piece gets the ink (as you can see in the photo below), some of which eventually leaks through to the bottom piece, I assume. The typewriter itself was the exact model that Henry Miller used to compose this novel.

This is the kind of pointless, absurd act that I associate with a certain strain of performance. The Art Guys' best performances are along these lines. It's the kind of performance that no one sees the entirety of. It's not theatrical or about entertainment. It's barely even about expression. It's about taking a banal act (like typing) and pushing it so far that it forces you to think about it in a different way. In engaging in this performance, Tim Youd is acquiring a new awareness of the act of typing and of Henry Miller and Tropic of Capricorn. And we get to watch.


Tim Youd, Typing Tropic, 2013, ongoing performance

Gleason printed up a newspaper give-away issue of Coagula for the show featuring interviews with the artists he showed. But true to Coagula's spirit, the cover article was about a Facebook flame war with David Rimanelli.

We Think Hard About Buying Some Art

Over at Adah Rose Gallery, DC noticed these paintings on metal tubes and square conduits by Brian Dupont. He was quite taken with them, and as it turned out, I knew Dupont. He had been in a two man show with Chris Rusak at Skydive in 2012. I even owned a postcard-sized piece by Dupont--my premium for supporting the Kickstarter that he and Rusak had to finance their travel and shipping. But my glancing familiarity with the artist wasn't what got DC interested--he saw the pieces before I even noticed them. But he was eager to get my opinion. We talked about them for a bit and then I moved on.


Brian Dupont, Pipe Piece III, oil on aluminum

A little while later, I returned to the Adah Rose booth, and DC was still there! He was chatting with the gallerist who had pulled out several more Brian Duponts from the back to show him. He was really weighing them carefully, examining each one. Many of them have fragments of text painted on them, and he wanted to know the source for each text piece. In the end, he didn't buy one there because if he liked the source of the text on a piece, he didn't like the painting, and when he liked the painting, he didn't like the text. In other words, he wanted the perfect combination of text and painting. But I also think he wasn't into the three-dimensionality of the pieces. That demands a lot of the viewer (there is a reason why paintings on tubes is not really a thing).

But a few weeks later, he asked me to look at some Dupont drawings online and give him my opinion. This is how DC buys art. He takes his time. He is the opposite of impulsive. In a sense, that makes him not the ideal art fair collector, but for DC, the benefit of an art fair is that you get introduced to a lot of artists' work. It's like speed-dating. And if after the introduction, you want to take that relationship deeper, you can.


Miki Taira, A Tale of Two Brother: the Long-armed Brother and His Long-Legged Sibling, 2013, linen, sumi ink, hanging scroll, acrylic mirror, 245 x 200 x 100 cm at Tokyo Gallery/Beijing Tokyo Art Projects

Miki Taira is a Japanese artist who studied calligraphy and now employs it in a way that deftly combines the contemporary with the folkloric. She writes out folktales onto linen and then makes objects (usually strange doll-like figures, but not always) with the linen.


Miki Taira, Charcoal-roasting Millionaire, 2012, linen, sumi ink,vinyl sheet, silk, acrylic case, 40.8 x 15.5 x 15.5 cm at Tokyo Gallery/Beijing Tokyo Art Projects

LM had first seen her work at an art fair in Hong Kong (And I think he said he bought one there). He had come to Pulse earlier in the week and bought another one. For an artist, this has to be one of the advantages of having your work shown at an art fair. It becomes possible for you to develop international collectors. 
 


There was an elaborate (and beautiful) process for packing up Miki Taira's piece. This level of attention to wrapping it up seems stereotypically Japanese. But I'm sure it is also highly practical when it comes to shipping the work.



LM had become acquainted with Galería Nieves Fernández in Spain at ARCO (LM is something of an art fair road warrior).  So gallerist Nerea Fernández took us on a guided tour of the work in her booth, including this suite of works by Danica Phelps. What Phelps does is to draw a picture of something she bought. The drawings are beautiful pencil contour drawings with no chiaroscuro for the most part. Then she indicates how much she paid for the thing with red hashmarks painted below the drawing. If she sells the drawing, she makes a copy of it (by hand), with the same red hashmarks, but adds green hashmarks to indicate how much she was paid for the drawing. She also includes on the new drawing the name of the person who bought the previous drawing and where it was bought. So she could conceivably sell drawings of the same subject many time, with the green painted hashmark area getting bigger in each iteration. And perhaps most eccentric of all, she puts a price on each piece.


Danica Phelps, McDonald's Coffee and Cookies, March 16, 2013, 2013, pencil on vellum, mounted onto paper which is in turn mounted onto wood

So I was looking at each of these drawings when I noticed that McDonald's Coffee and Cookies, March 16, 2013 had a price of $200 on it. That couldn't be right. I asked Fernández about it, and she confirmed with a sigh that this drawing was indeed selling for $200. (I later wrote to Phelps and asked about it--she said "It is an important part of my work that it be accessible to all kinds of different people." Including people like me!) I impulsively decided to buy it. I only had $180 in cash on me, so LM kicked in an additional $20.

Even though the first generation had been made less than two months earlier, it had already sold once to a guy named Knut Marten at the Cologne Art Fair. Phelps got $100 after the gallery's cut, which is indicated by the 100 green hashmarks. If she does another version of McDonald's Coffee and Cookies, March 16, 2013, it will have 200 green hasmarks on it and my name as the second buyer.

That was our Pulse experience. DC had to leave us at this point--he had a wife and children at home that wanted their daddy back. But LM, like me, was maximizing his art experience and had one more stop to make. He invited me along, and that's the subject of part 5.

Share

Bert Long's Overalls

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

I was at the Houston Museum of African American Culture a couple of weeks ago for an opening and noticed that in their front gallery there were a group of Bert Long, Jr., paintings and an old pair of overalls.


Bert Long's Overalls

There is nothing about this exhibit on the HMAAC website. I don't know the names of the pieces, except in one case where the name was written on it. I don't know when they were done. And I don't know how long they will be there. They may be gone already. I hope not; I want to go back and look at them again.



The last thing I would have expected Bert Long to paint is a self-portrait in a toreador outfit. But here it is and it's fantastic. It seems like something that may be from an art historical source, but I can't locate a similar toreador paintings by any of the usual suspects.

 
Bert Long, Spirit of Art

When Bert Long saw rapidly melting colored ice treats (or whatever these things are), he saw the Spirit of Art.



The thing that is great about this old ragged banner is the flower Long placed where the stars would normally go. I propose this design to replace our current flag.

The museum has an enclosed back yard that I had never visited before.



It's long and narrow and surrounded on two sides by freshly built tall townhouses. This makes it fairly shady and cool (depending on the time of year, of course). The lawn of clover (or something like clover) adds to the effect. It is a perfect setting for a sculpture garden. These are pieces that are related to Long's well-known Field of Vision sculpture group on Elgin. But I think this setting is more beautiful, and the scattering of eyes on pedestals here is just right.









This is a magic place.  I want to return and just sit for a while.


Share

Pan Recommends for the week of May 30 to June 5

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

There's a lot of stuff going on this weekend, of which the list below is just a small sample. The tough question is what to do Saturday--see all the exhibits opening in Houston (including most of the Colquitt galleries) or go down to Galveston and check out the openings there? (Of course you could try for both if you're willing to risk a speeding ticket.)

THURSDAY


Jeremy DePrez

Jeff Elrod and Jeremy DePrez: Fantasy Island at Texas Gallery, 6 pm (runs through July 6). Young Houston painter DePrez is teamed with established Brooklyn/Marfa artist Elrod--the combination is intriguing.

FRIDAY

 
The Opulent Project, Silver Digital Ring, sterling silver cast from 3-D printed model of digital ring designs found online

Ctrl+P featuring the Opulent Project, Bryan Czibesz and Shawn Spangler, Stacy Jo Scott, and the Ryder Jon Piotrs Nomadic Gallery at the Houston Center for Contemporary Craft, 5:30 pm (runs through September 8). Very interesting sounding show--with 2-D archival printing and now 3-D printing, the line between the craft world and the digital world has blurred.

 
Gary Schott, Plumb Bob Broach #2

Gary Schott: The Ornamental Plumb Bob at Houston Center for Contemporary Craft, 5:30 pm (runs through September 8). Schott had a great show at Goldesbury Gallery in 2010, so I expect a this exhibit will be excellent.


Cerling (left) and Topek (right)

Penny Cerling and Toby Topek at Zoya Tommy Contemporary, 6 pm (runs through June 29 with an artist talk on June 1 at 2 pm). Two revered elders of the Houston art scene are joined for this exhibit.


Judy Ledgerwood, Composition in Yellow, Orange, and Pink, 2013, oil on canvas, 96 x 120 inches 

Judy Ledgerwood: Fields and Flowers at Barbara Davis Gallery at 6:30 pm (runs through July 5). I know nothing about artist Judy Ledgerwood, but I like pretty things.

 
Whatchoo talkin' bout, Willis?

Bill Willis: New Paintings at The Joanna Gallery at 7 pm. I love how the Joanna's website hasn't been updated since 2010. I guess it never will now. This is the last Joanna show. Our little girl is all growed up.

SATURDAY

 
Tracye Wear, Winter Evening, 2013, encaustic and oil stick, 30"x 20"

Tracye Wear at d. m. allison, 4 to 9 pm (runs through June 29). Thick encastic gives Wear's paintings a relief quality. You'll want to touch them, but please refrain from manhandling the art.

 
Devon Christopher Moore, Pontchartrain, Bracket – B, Etched acrylic lacquer on galvanized steel 

Devon Christopher Moore: The Gravity of Time at Nicole Longnecker Gallery at 5 pm (runs through July 6). With the Joanna ending, it's nice to be able to welcome a new gallery. Good luck, Nicole Longnecker Gallery on your first ever exhibit!

 
Zachery Zeke Podgorny

Galveston Artist Residency Exhibition featuring Josh Bernstein, Zachary Zeke Podgorny and Davide Savorani at 6 pm (runs through July 20). The GAR celebrates its second year with a show of its residents. And by the way, I think the parents who named their child Zachary Zeke are awesome.


Marcelyn McNeil, Good Day Bad Day, 2013

Marcelyn McNeil: Bent into Shape at Galveston Arts Center at 6 pm (runs through July 7). An excellent painter whose work can maybe be described as bold, cartoony abstraction has a show at the GAC.

Share

Big Five Oh, part 5: Nina Katchadourian at Catharine Clark Gallery

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

After Pulse, DC left us and LM and I continued to our next stop, our second apartment gallery of the day, Catherine Clark Gallery. Catherine Clark will have a storefront opening in San Francisco in July and has this apartment gallery in New York: I guess this is a bi-coastal gallery. LM had been invited to this show, and when he got there, he knew a lot of people. Much more than DC or I, LM is plugged into the art world. I hate it when the person I'm with knows a ton of people and I don't know anyone. Actually, I sort of knew a couple of people--the first Houston people I had seen all weekend, Lea Weingarten and Richard Herskowitz. The show was a small group of photos of books by Nina Katchadourian, celebrating her new book, Sorted Books.


Nina Katchadourian, Kinds of Love, 2002, C-prints, each 12.5 x 19 inches

I had seen examples of these photos (such Kinds of Love above) where Katchadourian would take several books, arrange their spines facing the camera so that the titled were lined up, picking titles that told a little story or formed a sentence or an idea. Some of them were pretty clever, but as art it felt gimmicky. This seems to be work that has really caught on, though.


Nina Katchadourian, Self-Portrait as Sir Ernest Shackleton, 2002 , C-print, 6.5 x 4.5 inches

Looking at her website, I actually find some of her other work more appealing. These is current of humor that runs through all her work, but I enjoyed her series of Uninvited collaborations with nature better than the Sorted Book series. For instance, the serious quality of Self-Portrait as Sir Ernest Shackleton is completely undermined when you realize that her mustache is actually two caterpillars. But maybe using caterpillars this way is wrong. Hence Quit Using Us.


Nina Katchadourian, Quit Using Us, 2002, C-print mounted to aluminum, 18 x 96 inches

Most of the photos on display were a variation on Sorted Books idea. Instead of showing the spines of fairly recent books, as had been previously done, these photos each showed the covers of three or four quite old books. Once again these covers told a little story or joke using the titles of the books. This series is called Once Upon a Time in Delaware/In Search of the Perfect Book.


Nina Katchadourian,  from the series Once Upon a Time in Delaware/In Search of the Perfect Book


Nina Katchadourian,  from the series Once Upon a Time in Delaware/In Search of the Perfect Book


Nina Katchadourian,  from the series Once Upon a Time in Delaware/In Search of the Perfect Book


Nina Katchadourian,  from the series Once Upon a Time in Delaware/In Search of the Perfect Book 

Katchadourian was interviewed by curator Veronica Roberts about Sorted Books. Needless to say, there is more to the project than mere clever juxtaposition of book titles. Any given grouping of books comes from the library of a particular person. Presumably it is the library of someone with a substantial number of books. Katchadourian is then given free reign to pick and choose any of the books in the library to photograph. Now if you believe that a personal library is a reflection of its owner (I do, and if I am in someone's home, I find myself examining what's on the shelves for insight into their owner), then you could see these selections as snapshots of the books' owner. Maybe. I don't know what Kinds of Love tells us about Linda Pace, whose library was used for that photo.


From left to right: Entertained adult, bored child, Veronica Roberts, Nina Katchadourian

The adults were perfectly entertained by this question and answer session, but the kids in the room were pretty bored. As soon as it was over, they ran outside and started playing on the stairs. They were still playing there when I left. LM and I discussed possibly meeting up for more art-viewing in Miami in December and then I said my goodbyes. I wish I could have found a cab, but that can be a challenge on a Friday night--I ended up walking back to the Lower East Side, and went to sleep exhausted.

Share

Tom Arnold or Mark Flood?

$
0
0
 
Bill Willis, Mark, 2013, oil on canvas

Seen inBill Willis: New Paintings at The Joanna. Goodbye, Joanna. I'll miss you.

Share

Cerling and Topek, Houston Masters

$
0
0
Robert Boyd

Toby Topek and Penny Cerling are showing new work at Zoya Tommy Gallery. What they have in common is important--they are women who have been producing art in Houston for decades. But the interesting thing about this exhibit is that their work is so distinct. The only thing they have in common is that they aren't, strictly speaking, paintings. I think ther are some painted elements in Topek's work, but it isn't dominant. And even though Cerling's pieces are on panels, they are drawings, not paintings.


Penny Cerling, Charting the Unseen (with NCY Grid) #3.11, ink on board, 32 x 32 inches

Cerling began studying printmaking in 1979 and started working at Little Egypt Enterprises in 1980. She was a printmaker for many of Houston's best-known artists for over two decades. I mention this because when I look at the fine lines and smeary ink of her pieces, I am reminded of etchings. The works recall antique scientific or technical illustration. So aspects of pieces appear to be depictions of biological things, some architectural, some mathematical. The combination of these disparate elements into a single drawing brings to mind artists and thinkers from the Renaissance, when there was suddenly access to floods of new knowledge. Artists like Leonardo da Vinci and Albrecht Dürer were influenced by ideas of neo-platonism and the relationship of the macrocosmos and microcosmos to man.



Penny Cerling, Charting the Unseen (With Alhambra Floor Plan) #2.11, ink on panel, 2 pieces, 32" x 32"

This relationship is what I see in Cerling's work in this show. In Charting the Unseen (With Alhambra Floor Plan) #2.11, the human--the floor plan of the Alhambra, is linked in a chain with the mathematical (the radial graphs). Perhaps the white void in the center can be thought of as "the One" in neo-Platonism.

The drawings seem therefore quite metaphysical. But the deliberately antique look of the pieces complicates any simple interpretation. When some aspect of a piece of art is a pastiche (and I would contend that this is true in all of Cerling's pieces here), there is an implication that the artist is standing outside the subject of the work looking in. Perhaps this distance is ironic, perhaps it is a distance filled with longing. Carling can't be a Renaissance Neo-Platonist, but she can draw like one and relate their ideas to modern scientific notions. This "distance" is what separates a visionary artist from an intellectual one. I would put Cerling in the latter category.


Toby Topek, 28 small pieces

If Cerling is deliberately referencing older art in her work, Toby Topek's work feels relatively contemporary. That makes the combination of the two artists in one show all the more interesting.

Toby Topek, Frozen Finger, 2012-13, thread and mixed media/collage, 9 x 9 inches

Most contemporary collage doesn't feel significantly different from early Dada collage. You can see some of that influence in Topek's pieces, such as Frozen Finger. But the addition of the thread distinguishes the work. With Frozen Finger, you first notice the red thread. It is a clever use of the thread element and it changes the meaning of the collaged hand. But after a while you notice the black thread underneath--the circular shape covered with random short stitches, the three horizon-like lines, two dotted and one solid. These remove the piece from being merely clever. They complicate any interpretation.


Toby Topek, Keepsake, 2012, thread and mixed media/collage, 11.5 x 11.5 inches

Keepsake resembles Frozen Finger with its disembodied hand. These pieces (and others in the exhibit) remind me specifically of Max Ernst's untitled collage from 1920 which depicts a flying machine with a pair of arms. Topek has probably seen it in the Menil. It suggests a lineage for this work.


Toby Topek, Magnetic, 2012-13, thread and mixed media/collage, 9 x 9 inches


Toby Topek, Rapture, 2012-13, thread and mixed media/collage, 9 x 9 inches

The thread in the pieces could also refer to the string of a puppeteer. Magnetic suggests that--in this case the puppet has cut its strings. But the strings also bind, as in Rapture. Both the idea of being bound and the idea of being controlled (as in being a puppet) relate to some of the other subject matter, tyranny.


Toby Topek, Autocrat-red, 2012-13, thread and mixed media/collage, 9 x 9 inches

Topek draws several Autocrats and includes work related to the Arab Spring. So the work in the show is, in part, political. Unlike heavy-handed agit-prop style political art (some of that kind of political art is included in The Station's current street art show), Topek is not demanding action. She is responding to the world. Her work reminds me a little of Nancy Spero's both in her use of collage and her sense of outrage.


Toby Topek, The Awakening, 2012-13, thread and mixed media/collage, 14 x 17 inches

The thing about a Western artist doing art about the Arab Spring is that the art is inherently impotent. It's someone looking at the news and being shocked or angered and having a response. But whatever the artist's response, it won't change a thing in Syria or Egypt or Iran. So why do it?


Toby Topek, The Awakening (detail), 2012-13, thread and mixed media/collage, 14 x 17 inches

I don't have an answer for this. I suspect Topek just felt compelled to create these works. They are deliberate and carefully made, but they feel like instantaneous expressions of grief and anger. A piece like The Awakening not only deals with the Libyan revolution, but it reflects Topek's (and our) experience of it--a flood of words from the news. Topek's art acknowledges her own physical distance from the events, but brings us in direct contact with her own highly personal reaction to them. This kind of political art is itself part of a long tradition. Spero was part of that tradition which goes back at least to Goya.

I wasn't familiar with Topek's work prior to this show, and I don't know how this work fits in with her previous work. But I love it.

Share
Viewing all 665 articles
Browse latest View live